Facing criminal charges in Union, SC can be a deeply traumatic experience, with even minor offenses having a significant impact on an individual's personal and professional life. The consequences of a criminal record can be severe, resulting in job loss, loss of friendships, and even estrangement from family. For many, the only hope of leading a normal life is to have a skilled criminal defense lawyer in Union, SC, fighting for their rights from the outset of legal proceedings.
This is where Lauren Taylor Law comes in, offering hope and proficient legal representation to those who need it most. Our criminal defense team was established specifically to help hardworking people who are facing a difficult road ahead due to criminal charges. With years of experience and deep knowledge in the field, we are committed to ensuring our clients maintain their freedom, so they can move forward with their lives and provide for their families.
We have extensive experience in handling all types of criminal cases in Union, SC, from run-of-the-mill DUI charges to more nuanced cases involving juvenile offenses. Unlike other criminal defense law firms, we take a personalized approach to every case, utilizing cutting-edge legal strategies and innovative technologies to ensure the best possible outcomes for our clients.
Some of the most common cases that our lawyers work with include the following:
Selecting the best criminal defense lawyer for your case in South Carolina often means the difference between freedom and conviction. When your future is on the line, contact Lauren Taylor Law to work with a fierce advocate willing to fight for your rights. Of course, when you've been charged with a crime, having extra knowledge about South Carolina law can go a long way. Before we touch on some of our specialties, it's important for you to understand the various types of criminal defense cases in South Carolina.
Criminal cases in South Carolina are broken down into a few different categories. As a very general rule, crimes that are punishable by three years or less are considered misdemeanors in South Carolina. Anything punishable by more than three years in prison is usually classified as a felony.
Crimes can be classified as either state crimes or federal crimes, depending on whether they violate state laws or federal laws. The decision on which category to pursue charges under is typically made by the prosecutor. Generally speaking, crimes such as assault, robbery, domestic violence, theft, and rape are considered state crimes. Federal crimes, on the other hand, may include computer crime, major drug trafficking, hate crimes, and money laundering, which are often handled by agencies like the FBI or IRS.
It's common for cases to be resolved outside of court. A plea deal allows the defendant to admit guilt to one or more charges without having to go through the trial process. In fact, your criminal defense attorney in Union, SC, and the prosecutor of your case work together to reach a mutually agreeable deal, to avoid the risks and unpredictability of a trial. By taking a plea deal, you may receive a reduced sentence and avoid the stress of a full-blown legal battle.
For the average person charged with their first crime, understanding the difference between a misdemeanor crime and a felony crime can be hard to grasp. In simple terms, misdemeanors are usually considered petty crimes. They often result in fines and can involve time already served at a local county jail. Trials and plea deals for such offenses often move quickly due to their nature.
On the other hand, felonies are much more serious crimes that are classified by degrees. The most severe of these are first-degree felonies, while the least serious are sixth-degree felonies. When someone is charged with a felony, they may face hefty fines and a prison sentence of over a year in a federal or state institution. Those who have been convicted of a felony may encounter difficulties after their release, which is why it's crucial to have a reliable criminal defense attorney.
SC Code Section 16-1-20 provides us with a helpful penalty outline as it relates to felonies and misdemeanors:
It's important to note that these are maximum sentences, and the actual sentence may be less depending on the specific circumstances of the crime.
Hiring a criminal defense lawyer is a serious decision that should not be delayed. The longer you wait, the fewer opportunities you have for a positive outcome, as the penalties, fines, and potential jail time can increase. It's important to seek counsel from experienced criminal law attorneys, like Lauren Taylor Law, to protect your career, family, and personal freedom. When you work with our criminal defense law firm in South Carolina, you can rest easy knowing we:
Here are just a few reasons you should hire a seasoned attorney if you've been charged with a crime in South Carolina:
Hiring a skilled criminal defense lawyer is crucial for many reasons, one of which is their understanding of the complex judicial system. The legal system can be difficult to navigate, even for those who work within it frequently.
But with a proficient defense lawyer on your side, you'll have a personal guide through the process specific to your criminal case in South Carolina. At Lauren Taylor Law, we believe in demystifying the judicial process by providing one-on-one counsel and a comprehensive explanation of South Carolina court proceedings when needed.
When you work with Lauren Taylor Law, you're being represented by a team of hardworking, client-first advocates who aren't afraid to fight for your rights. That's very important in the world of criminal law, where lawyers and other parties may try to fool you into saying or doing something to jeopardize your case. From your initial consultation to the time your case is closed, your criminal defense attorney in Union, SC, should always prioritize your best interests and advise you on how to proceed in your case.
If you are facing criminal charges, a skilled defense attorney can advocate for you and work to secure a better outcome. They may be able to negotiate reduced charges or penalties or even have your case dismissed if the police obtained evidence illegally.
This can prevent a felony conviction from tarnishing your record and causing harm to your current or future career. Additionally, a reduction in penalties can help you avoid jail time and hold onto your job. Ultimately, a dismissal of your case can spare you from a life in the legal system and help you secure a better future for yourself and your family.
At Lauren Taylor Law, our criminal defense attorneys have decades of combined experience. We've seen and done just about all there is to do in terms of criminal defense in South Carolina. Along the way, we've developed relationships with local prosecutors that help us obtain desirable results for clients. Establishing a cordial rapport with an "opponent" may seem strange, but it benefits both sides as familiarity breeds a more pleasant experience.
A skilled lawyer who has cultivated a positive relationship with your prosecutor can significantly impact the verdict of your case. Through their amicable ties, they may secure a favorable plea bargain or negotiate a reasonable bond. Our team of criminal defense attorneys has provided legal representation for clients in almost every county within South Carolina.
Could you imagine your criminal defense lawyer painting a positive picture of your case, only to be charged with a felony resulting in years of prison time? At Lauren Taylor Law, we aren't in the business of sugar-coating your case or bending the truth. We understand the potential consequences of a conviction and can offer guidance on the best course of action for your specific case.
Our experienced attorneys are knowledgeable about the tendencies of judges in South Carolina and can advise you on whether to accept a plea deal or fight the charges in court. We prioritize your best interests and work to ensure the best possible outcome for your case. That way, you have a fair shot at freedom and living a normal life outside of the South Carolina court system.

One of the most common questions we hear from prospective clients is, "When should I hire a criminal defense attorney for my case in Union, SC?" While no two situations or clients are ever truly the same, there are common criminal situations to consider. Here are some guidelines to help you determine when it's appropriate to hire a criminal defense attorney for your case:
If you have been associated with any convictions mentioned above, it is crucial to seek the assistance of a lawyer or law firm experienced in handling such cases. Losing a case could have severe consequences, and you need expert guidance to navigate through the legal process. At Lauren Taylor Law, our criminal defense attorneys are well-versed in handling such cases and can offer you a consultation to help you understand your rights.
If you have been accused of a crime, you and your family are probably curious about the process that lies ahead regarding your criminal case. Generally speaking, the process for criminal cases in South Carolina is as follows:
Investigation: Law enforcement will investigate and gather evidence before charging you with a crime.
Charges: After your arrest, you will have a trial to determine the charges being presented against you. It's recommended to find a lawyer as soon as possible to help defend your case.
Initial hearing: You will be brought before a magistrate judge to learn more about the charges being brought against you.
Discovery: Before the trial, the prosecutor and your attorney will gather evidence and information to prepare their cases. This includes finding witnesses to testify during the trial.
Plea bargaining: If the case against you is strong, the prosecutor may offer a plea deal to lessen the severity of the sentencing. If you plead guilty, there will be no trial, and the charges will be determined.
Preliminary hearing: In some cases, there may be a hearing to present evidence in your favor before the trial, after you have chosen to plead not guilty.
Pre-trial motions: Before the trial, the prosecutor can make a motion to decide on a certain issue. These motions range from dismissing a charge to moving the trial venue.
Trial: Both sides present their case during the trial and bring in evidence to convince the jury. Shortly after the trial, the verdict is announced.
By understanding the legal process for criminal cases in South Carolina, you can better prepare for what's ahead and work with your criminal defense attorney in Union, SC, to defend your case.
Having served criminal defense clients in South Carolina for years, our team of experienced lawyers has worked with a litany of cases, from minor misdemeanors to serious felonies. We understand that no two issues are the same and that every client has unique needs and concerns regarding their case. We also understand that knowledge can go a long way, and as such, would like to summarize some standard cases our attorneys work with daily:
DUIs: Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs can result in a fine or jail time. A SC DUI lawyer can defend your rights during your case.
Misdemeanors: These crimes are less severe than felonies and are usually punishable with fines and jail time. Many of the crimes we handle at Lauren Taylor Law are misdemeanors at the state level.
Burglary: When you enter a home and commit theft, you've committed a burglary. This crime is a felony and, as such, can result in up to 10 years of prison time.
Domestic Violence: This type of crime can range from abuse in the family home to a fight in public. Penalties for domestic abuse range in severity and can change if an injury is involved.
Drug Charges: Drug charges are very common in South Carolina and can range from possession, intent to deliver, and trafficking.
Shoplifting: This crime is a form of theft that may be classified as an infraction rather than a misdemeanor in certain cases.
Theft: Theft, or larceny, is defined as unlawfully taking possessions that belong to an entity or person. Theft is different from burglary and shoplifting, though prosecutors often stack those charges together.
Weapons Charges: Possessing, utilizing, or selling an unlicensed weapon are all examples of weapons charges, which can carry very serious consequences in South Carolina.
Juvenile Crimes: When it comes to criminal charges involving minors, the term "juvenile crime" refers to offenses committed by individuals under the age of 18. However, depending on the seriousness of the crime, some young people may face trial as adults.
Violent Crimes: When an individual is subjected to or threatened with violence, it is considered a violent crime.
Lauren Taylor Law is the go-to choice for clients who value honesty, hard work, and transparent communication. Our mission is not to judge individuals who have been accused of crimes. Rather, we aim to secure the best possible defense for our clients while upholding their rights and freedom. If you or someone you care about is facing criminal charges in South Carolina, don't leave your fate to chance. Take the necessary precautions to protect yourself before it's too late - contact a Lauren Taylor Law criminal defense attorney in Union, SC today.
843-790-9009
64°Greenville, SCCrews responding to fire at apartment building in Union Co., dispatch saysPanthers legend Luke Kuechly reacts to Hall of Fame induction, recounts surprise from Julius PeppersUpdated: 18 minutes ago|Panthers legend Luke Kuechly reacts to Hall of Fame induction, recounts surprise announcement from former teammate and fellow Hall of Famer Julius PeppersUpstate man given maximum sentence after luring, sexually assaulting minorUpdated: 1 hour ago|He pleaded ...
64°Greenville, SC
Updated: 18 minutes ago
|
Panthers legend Luke Kuechly reacts to Hall of Fame induction, recounts surprise announcement from former teammate and fellow Hall of Famer Julius Peppers
Updated: 1 hour ago
|
He pleaded guilty during a plea hearing on Tuesday.
Updated: 2 hours ago
|
The charges stem from two separate investigations in 2025.
Updated: 3 hours ago
|
He pleaded guilty on Feb. 9, according to the solicitor's office.
Updated: 4 hours ago
|
FOX Carolina's Chrissy Kohler has more details.
Updated: 7 hours ago
|
FOX Carolina's Dana Winter has the details.
News
First Alert Weather
Palmetto Sports
Traffic
Things to Do
Contact Us
Careers
Public Inspection File
kelli.radcliff@foxcarolina.com - 864-213-2103
FCC Applications
EEO Statement
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Advertising
Digital Marketing
Closed Captioning/Audio Description
Click here to learn more about our approach to artificial intelligence.
A Gray Local Media Station © 2002-2026
Chandigarh, February 9:Under the leadership of Chief Minister S. Bhagwant Singh Mann, the Punjab Government is working tirelessly for the welfare of all sections of society. Along with this, special efforts are being made to safeguard the rights of the Scheduled Caste (SC) and Backward Class (BC) communities and to ensure their social and economic upliftment. This was stated by Cabinet Minister for Social Justice, Empowerment and Minorities, Dr. Baljit Kaur.A meeting was held at Punjab Bhawan between Cabinet Mi...
Chandigarh, February 9:
Under the leadership of Chief Minister S. Bhagwant Singh Mann, the Punjab Government is working tirelessly for the welfare of all sections of society. Along with this, special efforts are being made to safeguard the rights of the Scheduled Caste (SC) and Backward Class (BC) communities and to ensure their social and economic upliftment. This was stated by Cabinet Minister for Social Justice, Empowerment and Minorities, Dr. Baljit Kaur.
A meeting was held at Punjab Bhawan between Cabinet Minister Dr. Baljit Kaur and representatives of the SC/BC Union.
During the meeting, the Minister listened carefully to the demands raised by the Union representatives and assured them that all genuine demands would be addressed on priority.
The Minister clarified that issues which can be resolved at the departmental level will be addressed promptly in a time-bound manner. She further stated that matters requiring decisions at the government level will be taken up with the government at the earliest to ensure appropriate resolution.
Dr. Baljit Kaur said that to realise Chief Minister Bhagwant Singh Mann’s vision of a “Rangla Punjab,” it is essential that every section of society becomes an integral part of the development process. She emphasised that the dream of a vibrant Punjab cannot be fulfilled without ensuring dignity,
equal opportunities and justice for the SC and BC communities. “A truly Rangla Punjab will emerge only when there is prosperity in every household, confidence in every mind and equal opportunities for every section of society,” she said.
She reiterated that the Punjab Government is fully committed to the welfare of marginalised and backward sections and is continuously taking concrete and effective steps in this direction. The meeting concluded in a well-organised and positive atmospher.
On the occasion, the meeting was attended by the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Justice, Empowerment and Minorities, Mr. V.K. Meena IAS, the Director of the Department, Mrs. Vimmi Bhullar, IAS and other senior officers of the department.
Five bridges & critical road projects to boost connectivity and spur economic growth in the region, says Bains
Chandigarh: Reaffirming the Punjab Government’s commitment to the welfare of marginalized communities, Cabinet Minister for Social Justice, Empowerment and Minorities Dr. Baljit Kaur held a meeting with representatives of the SC/BC Union at Punjab Bhawan. The meeting focused on addressing issues related to the social and economic upliftment of Scheduled Caste (SC) and Backward Class (BC) communities.Government Committed to SC and BC WelfareSpeaking during the meeting, Dr. Baljit Kaur said the Punjab Gov...
Chandigarh: Reaffirming the Punjab Government’s commitment to the welfare of marginalized communities, Cabinet Minister for Social Justice, Empowerment and Minorities Dr. Baljit Kaur held a meeting with representatives of the SC/BC Union at Punjab Bhawan. The meeting focused on addressing issues related to the social and economic upliftment of Scheduled Caste (SC) and Backward Class (BC) communities.
Speaking during the meeting, Dr. Baljit Kaur said the Punjab Government is working tirelessly for the welfare of all sections of society, with special emphasis on safeguarding the rights of SC and BC communities. She underlined that inclusive development remains a key priority of the Bhagwant Mann-led government.
Read also: Punjab to Open ‘Blue Cross’ Veterinary Medicine Stores Offering Up to 30% Discount for Livestock Farmers
The Cabinet Minister patiently listened to the demands raised by SC/BC Union representatives and assured them that all genuine demands would be addressed on priority.
She clarified that:
Dr. Baljit Kaur emphasized that achieving Chief Minister Bhagwant Singh Mann’s vision of a “Rangla Punjab” is only possible when every section of society is actively included in the development process.
“A truly Rangla Punjab will emerge only when there is prosperity in every household, confidence in every mind, and equal opportunities for every section of society,” she said.
She added that the dignity, justice, and equal opportunities of SC and BC communities are essential pillars of the state’s development journey.
Reiterating the government’s resolve, Dr. Baljit Kaur said the Punjab Government is continuously taking concrete and effective steps to ensure the welfare, empowerment, and upliftment of marginalized and backward sections of society.
The meeting concluded in a positive and constructive atmosphere, reflecting mutual cooperation and shared commitment toward inclusive development in Punjab.
Read also: Punjab Strengthens Investment Ties in Mumbai Roadshow, Focuses on Job Creation and MSME Growth
Union Minister Giriraj Singh on Thursday thanked the Supreme Court for putting a stay on the new UGC regulations and said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has never discriminated against anyone. Speaking with ANI, Giriraj Singh said, “I thank everyone, including the country’s Prime Minister Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah. I thank the court for the decision it has passed. Prime Minister Modi has never discriminated against anyone in the country. It was Prime Minister Modi who gave reservations to EWS. People like us live only f...
Union Minister Giriraj Singh on Thursday thanked the Supreme Court for putting a stay on the new UGC regulations and said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has never discriminated against anyone. Speaking with ANI, Giriraj Singh said, “I thank everyone, including the country’s Prime Minister Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah. I thank the court for the decision it has passed. Prime Minister Modi has never discriminated against anyone in the country. It was Prime Minister Modi who gave reservations to EWS. People like us live only for the people of our country.”BJP RS MP Manan Kumar Mishra also welcomed SC’s decision and assured that the government would resolve the “lacks” in the resolution. “The court’s interference seemed valid with some of the lacks in the Bill. Now the government and the UGC will get a chance. Our Education Minister had already said that there will be no discrimination against anyone… The government will now resolve the lacks,” he said. Sunil Dahiya, president of Vipra Foundation, said, “We respect the Supreme Court’s decision, and the Supreme Court always protects the Constitution. Our opposition is to government policies, including the government’s discriminatory and anti-caste policies. This has been going on for 80 years, against our children. For 80 years, the government has discriminated against us. They have made us criminals. We are not going to stop. We have understood that this country is being destroyed on the basis of caste. We will not let that happen.”Amid an uproar around the country over the alleged “discrimination” against the General Category in the University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026, the SC on Thursday stayed the regulations.The Top Court said that, for now, the 2012 UGC regulations will continue to apply. The Court opined that there is complete vagueness in Regulation 3 (C) (which defines caste-based discrimination), and it can be misused. “The language needs to be re-modified,” the Court said.The Court noted that this raises an unexamined concern: if a Group A Scheduled Caste individual makes discriminatory or derogatory remarks against a Group B Scheduled Caste individual, has this aspect been adequately addressed under the 2026 framework?After 75 years of trying to make a caste-less society, whether the direction of policy-making is progressive or tending towards a regressive approach, it asked.The new regulations, introduced to curb caste-based discrimination in colleges and universities, require institutions to establish special committees and helplines to address complaints from students in the Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST), and Other Backwards Classes (OBC) categories.Students, mostly from the general category, protested against regulations that promote discrimination on campuses rather than equality. The students noted that the regulation has no provision to address fraudulent complaints filed against General Category students
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday orally observed that trade union leaders are largely responsible for stopping industrial growth in the country, and all traditional industries in the country, all because these 'jhanda' unions have been closed.A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya said it cannot issue a writ asking the Centre and states to consider amending existing laws.Senior advocate Raju Ramachandran appeared for the petitioner organisation. Raju also relied on a S...
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday orally observed that trade union leaders are largely responsible for stopping industrial growth in the country, and all traditional industries in the country, all because these 'jhanda' unions have been closed.
A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya said it cannot issue a writ asking the Centre and states to consider amending existing laws.
Senior advocate Raju Ramachandran appeared for the petitioner organisation. Raju also relied on a Supreme Court judgment dated January 29, 2025, where the court had highlighted the plight of domestic workers and noted repeated but unsuccessful legislative attempts to enact a comprehensive law.
Raju said that while some states have notified minimum wages for domestic workers, others have failed to do so, despite the nature of domestic employment remaining uniform across the country
During the hearing, the bench observed that when a minimum wage is enforced, these unions will ensure that every household is dragged into litigation. Raju said in Singapore, you cannot hire a domestic maid unless you register that person and provide weekly offs, wages, etc.
“Sometimes in our anxiety about reforms. In our anxiety to bring a non-discriminatory perspective through legislative means, it leads unwittingly to further exploitation. You fix a minimum wage. Look at the need for employment in this country….demand is far less as compared to the supply….you fix minimum wages, people will refuse to hire and this will further generate hardship”, observed the CJI.
Raju said these are workers’ unions, these are domestic workers’ unions registered under the Trade Union Act.
The CJI said, “How many industries in this country have been closed, thanks to these trade unions? Let us know the reality also”. He added that all traditional industries in this country have been closed because of these jhanda unions, and “they do not want to work, these are all trade union leaders. They are largely responsible for stopping the industrialization growth in this country”.
The CJI said, of course, the exploitation is there undoubtedly, but the means should have been different to stop that exploitation. “People should have been made aware of their individual rights. People should have been made skilled instead of using them as manual labour…”, observed the CJI.
Raju said let us not generalize and talk of larger issues, because collective bargaining is a valuable right.
Responding to the submission regarding collective bargaining, which the petitioners contended could address these concerns, Justice Bagchi noted that domestic workers are already covered under existing welfare frameworks.
“It is not as if there is no safety net. The Unorganised Workers’ Social Security Act does take care of several aspects,” he said, while acknowledging that the petitioner’s concerns were “well taken.”
The bench, while acknowledging the “plight” of millions of domestic help across the country, maintained that the judiciary cannot encroach upon the legislative domain to mandate the enactment of laws. The bench also red-flagged the role of employment agencies in the exploitation of workers.
After hearing detailed submissions, the bench refused to entertain a PIL seeking a comprehensive legal framework and enforcement of minimum wages for domestic workers.
The bench, in its order, said, “No enforceable decree or order can be passed unless the legislature is asked to enact a suitable law. Such a direction we are afraid ought not to be issued by this court.”
The bench asked petitioners, including Penn Thozhilalargal Sangam, a domestic workers’ union, to highlight the plight of domestic help to states and the Union to take a suitable decision in the matter.
“We observe that petitioners may continue to highlight the plight of domestic helps and impress upon the stakeholders to take a final call in relation thereto.. and the correspondence shows it is under active consideration by states and we are hopeful that a suitable mechanism shall be deployed for their help and to prevent exploitation,” the bench said while disposing of the PIL.
The petition sought, among other reliefs, recognition of non-payment of minimum wages to domestic workers as a violation of fundamental rights and enforcement of minimum wage regimes across States.
Also Read