In the past, "dram shops" referred to bars and liquor stores that sold small quantities of whiskey or liquor. The issue arose when patrons, who had been served at these establishments, got involved in car accidents while driving, resulting in injuries. In today's context, drunk driving accidents often cause severe or catastrophic injuries. Unfortunately, many drunk drivers have inadequate insurance to cover the damages and injuries sustained by victims.
While South Carolina doesn't have a specific statute for dram shop claims, state courts allow injured victims to seek damages and recovery from alcohol-related accidents using the state's alcohol sale statutes and negligence laws. Consequently, it's possible to hold restaurants, bars, and other entities accountable for injuries sustained by the driver of a motor vehicle or boat.
Most adults know that driving under the influence isn't just dumb - it's downright dangerous. They know that DUIs often have long-lasting, traumatic effects for everyone involved. What many people don't know is how closely related DUI and dram shop cases are in South Carolina. Consider the following scenarios:
Perhaps a 24-hour gas station doesn't check an I.D. and sells a case of malt liquor to a minor. The minor becomes intoxicated, and with a blood alcohol level exceeding the state limit, the novice driver wrecks their vehicle. One person is killed, and another is seriously injured. Or, in another instance, a bartender gives an overtly intoxicated person one last drink before they leave. The bartender later finds out that the person they served caused a car accident and injured a family of four.
In South Carolina, there are no specific dram shop statutes in place. Nevertheless, the state's courts strive to offer protection to individuals who have suffered injuries due to a drunk driver. However, filing dram shop claims, proving negligence, and navigating insurance coverage can be complicated and frustrating. That's especially true when you're hurt due to no fault of your own, and you're just trying to get through the recovery process. If you've sustained injuries from a drunk driver and believe that the person's intoxication was caused by a third party, it's time to call a dram shop law firm like Lauren Taylor Law.
Dram shop injury victims choose Lauren Taylor and her team of lawyers because they don't shy away from challenging tavern-keeper liability cases. With exceptional investigative skills, they meticulously gather relevant facts, ask hard questions, and build claims that focus on the most favorable outcomes possible.
Here at Lauren Taylor Law, we've dedicated our legal careers to assisting individuals in finding solutions to challenging legal issues. We're not in the business of prioritizing quick settlements that don't serve our clients' best interests. With decades of combined trial experience, we're passionate about getting you the compensation you deserve and feel privileged to be your dram shop injury lawyer. If you've been hurt by a drunk driver and believe that the driver's intoxication was due to a third party's negligence, get in touch with our dram shop liability lawyers. We can work together to determine if a third party can be held legally responsible.
Dram shop laws in South Carolina are complex, and the situations leading up to a trial or court case can be nuanced and confusing. Having a reliable, compassionate lawyer by your side is the best way to understand the situation you're in and fight for the compensation you deserve. Here are just a few of the most significant reasons why you should consider hiring a dram shop lawyer:
You can rely on your dram shop lawyer to use legal precedents to demonstrate that the establishment licensee failed to fulfill their legal responsibilities to ensure the safety of patrons and the public. Precedent refers to the extensive body of previous dram shop lawsuit rulings in South Carolina that a court must consider when making decisions.
If you've experienced a serious accident that has impacted your financial and personal well-being, financial compensation can provide some relief. A dram shop injury lawyer can help you seek compensation for a variety of issues, which we'll cover in detail later. In cases where you have lost a spouse in a fatal accident, your lawyer can also help create a compensation proposal that considers the loss of financial and emotional support from that person.
In South Carolina dram shop cases, the court needs evidence that the bar or restaurant served too much alcohol to the customer. Evidence can come in various forms. Your dram shop attorney can handle this thorough and time-consuming task so you don't have to.
In addition to evidence gathering, you'll need an attorney to demonstrate that the person's intoxication directly caused the injuries or property damage in question. Your attorney will gather evidence linking the intoxicated individual to the harm. This meticulous legal work is best performed by a lawyer with experience in dram shop liability, who can fill in the missing timeline details of the day of the incident.
Insurance can help cover medical expenses, property damage, and other losses resulting from an incident. Unfortunately, dealing with insurers when you're already suffering from a serious injury or personal loss can be overwhelming. Hiring a dram shop lawyer not only simplifies this process but also helps ensure you receive all the benefits entitled to you under your policy.
Your dram shop lawyer should prioritize your best interests. Sometimes, that involves negotiating a fair settlement with the alcohol-serving establishment. Other times, the best outcomes come in court. Every dram shop accident claim is unique and requires individual consideration. Effectively presenting a case in front of a judge or jury is a specialized skill possessed by experienced litigators. When you hire an experienced, proactive dram shop injury attorney in Lancaster, SC, you can rest easy knowing you'll have strong representation in both private negotiations and in the courtroom.
Today, dram shop laws hold establishments accountable for serving alcohol to intoxicated customers who cause harm. If a bar or restaurant serves alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person who then causes a DUI accident, the establishment can be held liable for resulting injuries. The injured party can also pursue legal action against the intoxicated driver. Dram shop laws would also apply if the intoxicated patron caused harm or damage in a manner other than a car accident.
Dram shop laws are legal statutes that hold businesses accountable for serving alcohol to individuals who are already intoxicated or for selling alcohol to minors who then cause harm to themselves or others. If a business has a commercial liquor license or equivalent in South Carolina, liability may be incurred. Some of the most common types of businesses that incur dram shop liability include the following:
In the settings above, the establishment bears liability depending on the actions of their employees. Servers and other staff members who overserve intoxicated customers may be considered negligent. Some common staff positions that can be at fault under South Carolina dram shop law include managers, cashiers, store clerks, bartenders, and servers.
After an intoxicated driver causes an accident that injures another person, the victim can seek compensation from the establishment that overserved the intoxicated person. To successfully recover compensation in a dram shop case, your dram shop injury attorney in Lancaster, SC must prove that the business was negligent or intentional in serving a minor or an intoxicated person. At Lauren Taylor Law, our goal is to prove negligence in your dram shop case so that we may recover the maximum amount of damages to help you recover.
To do so, we aim to demonstrate the following
The injuries you sustained were primarily caused by the alcohol consumed by the intoxicated driver, which can be proven if the driver is found guilty of driving under the influence (DUI).
The establishment failed to fulfill its obligations to recognize intoxicated patrons, verify legal drinking age with I.D., refrain from serving alcohol to intoxicated or underage individuals, and arrange for safe transportation for intoxicated customers.
The establishment must have had a reasonable awareness that the customer was either intoxicated or underage. Checking the customer's I.D. can help establish their legal age. The level of intoxication can be assessed by observing the behavior of the individual or by tracking the number and type of drinks served to them within a specific period.
As your dram shop injury attorney in Lancaster, SC, one of our biggest jobs is supplying evidence proving that the dram shop in question was negligent. Examples of supporting evidence include the following:
Knowledge of Intoxication Evidence
The plaintiff and attorney must demonstrate that the alcohol establishment was aware or should have been aware that the customer was drunk, by showing that the bar had knowledge of intoxication or should have observed visible signs of drunkenness. Knowledge of intoxication can include knowing:
Visible signs of intoxication can include:
Duty of Care Evidence
Every business has an inherent responsibility to adhere to state law and refrain from serving individuals who are either under the legal drinking age or visibly intoxicated.
Breach of Duty Evidence
Proving that the establishment breached its duty to serve alcohol responsibly and follow the law can include showing that the establishment's employees:
Causation Evidence
An attorney can gather evidence to show that alcohol intoxication directly caused a drunk driving accident or injury by reviewing police reports, arrest records, and court documents. A conviction for DUI, DUAC, or any other alcohol-related offense can serve as compelling proof for legal action.
The short answer to this question is yes. A DUI or DUAC conviction can serve as crucial evidence to support a dram shop liability or drunk driving claim for compensation. Being convicted provides concrete proof that the driver failed in their duty of care, leading to subsequent injuries due to negligence. It's advantageous for victims to enlist a qualified dram shop injury attorney in Lancaster, SC to handle their dram shop liability case. Quality dram shop lawyers - like those at Lauren Taylor Law - conduct investigations into the source of the driver's intoxication and ascertain if any establishment contributed to over-serving the driver.
In dram shop liability cases, which are considered personal injury cases, the state allows a three-year window from the date of injury for victims to file a lawsuit against the bar that overserved a patron. If the filing deadline is missed, the judge may dismiss the case unless there is a valid legal exception. If you're thinking about taking legal action, it's important to reach out to Laurent Taylor Law as soon as possible to explore your options.
South Carolina state law ensures that victims of negligence have a way to obtain financial recovery after being injured in a bar or due to the actions of a negligent establishment. It's important to note that not only the victims of drunk driving accidents but anyone injured by an intoxicated person can file a dram shop liability claim. Compensation from dram shop cases can come from a variety of sources, including those below.
In South Carolina, businesses with an alcohol license are required to have at least one million dollars in liquor liability insurance. This insurance covers both economic and non-economic damages suffered by a victim.
If you're the victim of a DUI accident, you can recover economic damages under dram shop liability. Those damages can include the following:
You may also be eligible for non-economic damages in a dram shop liability claim. Those damages may include one or more of the following:
You can also seek punitive damages in a South Carolina dram shop liability case. These damages are awarded to punish a defendant for causing harm due to reckless, willful, or wanton misconduct. Your dram shop lawyer in South Carolina must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant's actions met the criteria described in the statute. The burden of proof is higher than that required to win compensatory damages in a dram shop liability case.
In drunk driving accidents, courts may consider awarding punitive damages because driving while intoxicated is a deliberate violation of the law that displays a reckless disregard for others. Unlike in most other cases where punitive damages are capped, South Carolina does not limit the amount awarded in a drunk driving case.
If you've been injured due to another person's negligence and you're ready to fight for damages, it's time to call Lauren Taylor Law. Let our team of dram shop injury lawyers litigate your case and secure maximum compensation for your lost wages, hospital bills, property damage, and other losses. When you partner with a proven, experienced, successful attorney, you can increase your chances of getting full compensation.
We have the skills and trial experience needed to handle complex dram shop claims, just like yours. To learn more about your alcohol-related accident and the opportunity to bring a lawsuit against a dram shop, contact us today to schedule a consultation at the law offices of Lauren Taylor.
Free Consultation. No Obligation. Completely Confidential
We guarantee 100% privacy. Your information will NOT be shared.
LANCASTER, S.C. (WBTV) - On Tuesday, voters in Lancaster considered a sales tax increase that county leaders have said will help fund transportation projects across Lancaster County.UPDATE: WBTV spoke with voters who said they have seen the growth in the county. Some believe growth is inevitable, while others say they want to see it slow. But almost everyone agreed that they want county leaders to address ongoing traffic concerns.“Oh, it’s expanding more than I could’ve thought when I moved to 17...
LANCASTER, S.C. (WBTV) - On Tuesday, voters in Lancaster considered a sales tax increase that county leaders have said will help fund transportation projects across Lancaster County.
UPDATE:
WBTV spoke with voters who said they have seen the growth in the county. Some believe growth is inevitable, while others say they want to see it slow. But almost everyone agreed that they want county leaders to address ongoing traffic concerns.
“Oh, it’s expanding more than I could’ve thought when I moved to 17 years ago,” said Indian Land resident Alicia Wesseling.
In 2024, voters turned down the sales tax referendum -- but it was back on the ballots on Tuesday, Nov. 4. Voters throughout the Carolinas cast ballots on Tuesday in local municipal elections.
---> More:
The Lancaster sales tax referendum was proposing a 1% increase that would collect $253 million to fund transportation projects.
Some Lancaster County residents were eager about growth.
“It’s needed,” said Indian Land resident Keith Hassell. “You know, change is good -- but I think not to change too fast.”
“I’ve seen it for a while actually. I’m excited about it. I think it’s overdue,” said Lancaster resident Elaine J. McKinney. “I think that Lancaster is a great place to grow, and coming down from Charlotte, we’re seeing it.”
Other residents shared that they want to see the growth happen slowly.
“I believe we should put a little bit more time and effort into what is planned for this area and what’s approved,” said Patrick Hurley, who lives in Indian Land.
The county sales tax would rise to 9% and expire after 10 years. Voters were also asked if they would allow the county to borrow funds through bonds to get started on the transportation projects and to be repaid after 10 years with the help of the transportation sales tax revenue.
Most residents share that they want to see the increase in traffic addressed.
“I commute up to Charlotte, and you can just see the traffic flows are just much more heavier,” said Lancaster resident Mike Stallone. “We’ve been here for about 10 years and it’s just exploded.“
“Whether it’s roundabout, anything like that that, will help with the traffic, because it’s ridiculous coming off of Johnson Road and then coming down here. It takes two-to-three-times longer than it did a few years ago,” Alicia Wesseling said.
LANCASTER, S.C. (WBTV) - Voters in Lancaster County on Tuesday rejected a transportation sales tax referendum for a second time.On Tuesday, Nov. 4, voters in Lancaster County, South Carolina voted against a transportation sales tax referendum in the 2025 municipal general elections. Lancaster County voters turned down the sales tax referendum in 2024, as well.With 100% of precincts reporting Tuesday night, tallies showed more than 67% of voters opposed the referendum, while more than 32% were in favor of it.---> Mo...
LANCASTER, S.C. (WBTV) - Voters in Lancaster County on Tuesday rejected a transportation sales tax referendum for a second time.
On Tuesday, Nov. 4, voters in Lancaster County, South Carolina voted against a transportation sales tax referendum in the 2025 municipal general elections. Lancaster County voters turned down the sales tax referendum in 2024, as well.
With 100% of precincts reporting Tuesday night, tallies showed more than 67% of voters opposed the referendum, while more than 32% were in favor of it.
---> More:
County leaders said money from the proposed 1% sales tax increase would’ve been used to help fund transportation projects across Lancaster County. The increase was projected to have collected $253 million to fund those projects.
WBTV spoke with voters who said they have seen the growth in the county. Some believe growth is inevitable, while others say they want to see it happen more slowly.
But almost everyone agreed that they want county leaders to address ongoing traffic concerns.
“It’s needed,” said Indian Land resident Keith Hassell. “You know, change is good -- but I think not to change too fast.”
“I’ve seen it for a while actually. I’m excited about it. I think it’s overdue,” said Lancaster resident Elaine J. McKinney. “I think that Lancaster is a great place to grow, and coming down from Charlotte, we’re seeing it.”
Some residents shared that they want to see the growth happen slowly.
“I believe we should put a little bit more time and effort into what is planned for this area and what’s approved,” said Patrick Hurley, who lives in Indian Land.
The county sales tax would rise to 9% and expire after 10 years. Voters were also asked if they would allow the county to borrow funds through bonds to get started on the transportation projects and to be repaid after 10 years with the help of the transportation sales tax revenue.
Most residents share that they want to see the increase in traffic addressed.
“I commute up to Charlotte, and you can just see the traffic flows are just much more heavier,” said Lancaster resident Mike Stallone. “We’ve been here for about 10 years and it’s just exploded.“
“Whether it’s roundabout, anything like that that, will help with the traffic, because it’s ridiculous coming off of Johnson Road and then coming down here. It takes two-to-three-times longer than it did a few years ago,” Alicia Wesseling said.
The president and incoming Chief Executive Officer of the state’s largest federal credit union is out, according to news reports.Keith Wilson, who’d been with South Carolina-based Founders Federal Credit Union for 25 years and was set to take over as CEO in January, is no longer with the company, Founders spokesperson Nicki Nash confirmed. The Lancaster News was the first to report Wilson’s departure.Founders Federal Credit Union is the state’s largest credit union, boasting some $4.7 billion in assets a...
The president and incoming Chief Executive Officer of the state’s largest federal credit union is out, according to news reports.
Keith Wilson, who’d been with South Carolina-based Founders Federal Credit Union for 25 years and was set to take over as CEO in January, is no longer with the company, Founders spokesperson Nicki Nash confirmed. The Lancaster News was the first to report Wilson’s departure.
Founders Federal Credit Union is the state’s largest credit union, boasting some $4.7 billion in assets and 860 employees serving 273,817 members in North and South Carolina, according to the company’s annual report from last year. It has nearly 50 locations across the Carolinas.
Nash, who was unavailable by phone, confirmed in an emailed statement that Wilson was “no longer with” the company and that CEO Bruce Brumfield would stay in his role after the credit union previously announced his retirement.
The credit union, headquartered in Lancaster, had named Wilson as the successor for Brumfield when his retirement was announced in January of this year. The news release, posted to the credit union’s website in January, has been taken down.
Two board members reached by a reporter — former University of South Carolina Athletic Director Ray Tanner and State Senator Allen Blackmon — declined to comment.
The credit union posted to social media Wednesday that Brumfield would remain CEO, at the request of the board.
“We appreciate [Wilson’s] contributions and wish him well,” Nash said in an emailed statement.
When the company announced Wilson’s upcoming promotion in January of this year, Brumfield said he was “confident [Wilson] has what it takes to lead this credit union.”
Brumfield has held the credit union’s top position for the last two decades and has worked for Founders for nearly four decades. He took over as CEO when Laura Fleming, who led the company for more than four decades, retired in 2002. An attempt to reach Brumfield was unsuccessful.
Founders Federal Credit Union began in 1950 under the name The Founders Difference, according to the company’s website, when a group of mill employees decided to start the credit union.
Many of the dogs chained, underweight and fighting infectionsLANCASTER COUNTY, S.C. (WBTV) - Four people are in custody after 47 dogs were rescued in Lancaster and Chester counties.The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division worked with other local law enforcement agencies to place the animals with the Humane World for Animals organization.Veterinarians have examined the animals and are being evaluated at a confidential location. One case manager with Humane World for Animals, Manuel Flores, said he was at the rescues ...
LANCASTER COUNTY, S.C. (WBTV) - Four people are in custody after 47 dogs were rescued in Lancaster and Chester counties.
The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division worked with other local law enforcement agencies to place the animals with the Humane World for Animals organization.
Veterinarians have examined the animals and are being evaluated at a confidential location. One case manager with Humane World for Animals, Manuel Flores, said he was at the rescues and said many of the animals were happy to see them.
The four people who were charged and identified as 33-year-old Diara Charles Talford, 32-year-old Devin Dashaud Mobley, 22-year-old Zion Damir Hairston, and 37-year-old Nicos Kendrell Little are all facing animal fighting or baiting charges and a number of other charges.
They are currently being held at the Lancaster and Chester County Detention Center. Flores said when rescuers arrived they found many of the dogs chained, underweight, and some were struggling with infections.
“You know we’re going to each dog, documenting the scene, evaluating their condition, their physical environment, and when it came time to get these dogs removed from the property, I mean they were just enjoying the company,” Flores said.
Flores said now many of the animals are being held until they are evaluated and ready to be placed in shelters and eventually homes.
“Our placement team will go ahead and do those outreaches to local shelters, possibly any fosters for any type of extended care for them,” Flores said.
The end of the year can be a busier time for many shelters, and the Lancaster County Animal Shelter is no exception. Over the last few years, they say they’ve seen an increase of around 200-300 pets a year. Now, they’re working to ensure animals are surrendered properly.
“Make sure that you actually have the facilities, that you actually have the discretionary income for the dog food, the cat food, actually even making sure that it has its proper shots and is cared for properly,” said Stephany Snowden, Lancaster County Deputy County Administrator.
The county’s shelter can hold around 60 dogs and 60 cats at a time. While they encourage adoptions, they want people who have pets to consider their current care, especially as it gets colder.
“You know, definitely, when we look at these cold snaps, we need to look at bringing them in if at all possible,” Snowden said. “You know they have the Taj Mahal of dog houses with heating capacity, but they just need to be properly sheltered.”
The 6th Circuit Court Solicitor’s Office will be prosecuting these cases where the 47 dogs were rescued.
Rescuers are urging people in the community to stay alert and report any unusual activity.
A South Carolina company just bought a long list of properties across York and Lancaster counties, combining for more than $85 million.Saviria LLC bought nine York County properties on Oct. 23 for a combined $35.8 million. The more than 20 acres includes commercial and residential sites in Rock Hill, Fort Mill and York. Saviria also bought nine Indian Land and Lancaster properties on Oct. 10 for $48.8 million. They combine for more than 150 acres.Saviria listed its owner’s address as a home in the Piper Glen area of Charl...
A South Carolina company just bought a long list of properties across York and Lancaster counties, combining for more than $85 million.
Saviria LLC bought nine York County properties on Oct. 23 for a combined $35.8 million. The more than 20 acres includes commercial and residential sites in Rock Hill, Fort Mill and York. Saviria also bought nine Indian Land and Lancaster properties on Oct. 10 for $48.8 million. They combine for more than 150 acres.
Saviria listed its owner’s address as a home in the Piper Glen area of Charlotte, according to land records in York and Lancaster counties. The limited liability company is registered in South Carolina, state records show, with a registered agent in Indian Land who could not immediately be reached for comment.
Rock Hill properties involved in the sales are the Founders Federal Credit Union building at Home Depot Boulevard and Celanese Road, plus land on three sides of the Mount Gallant and India Hook roads intersection.
Two small properties in Fort Mill are on the corner of Tom Hall and Sanders streets, near the Walmart Neighborhood Market shopping center. York sites are vacant properties at Alexander Love Highway and Court House Avenue.
The Charlotte company owns several other retail and residential properties throughout York County.
In Lancaster County, five of the now nine properties Saviria owns are connected just south of Fort Mill Highway in Indian Land, southwest of Stock Lane. Those vacant properties just east of the York County line combine for about 60 acres.
Another Indian Land site is more than 60 acres west of U.S. 521, opposite Marvin Road. Three more properties, including the one Saviria owned prior to last month, are vacant sites off Marvin Road near the Union County, North Carolina, line. They combine for more than 30 acres.
The final piece is a gas station at 1200 N. Main St. in Lancaster.
Saviria wasn’t the only company purchasing properties last month. Others include:
Along with commercial sites, there were 27 homes that sold in October for $1 million or more in the region.
A Rock Hill home on Ivy Arbor Circle led the way at $2.8 million. Fort Mill had nine million-dollar sales, followed by Lake Wylie with six, Tega Cay with five, Rock Hill with three and Indian Land with two. York and McConnells each had one.
Use the map below for details on all the million-dollar home sales, with the October deals listed with blue icons.