Call Lauren Taylor Law for Alcohol-Related Injuries and Accidents
Dram Shop Injury Attorney Spartanburg, SC

Dram Shop Injury Attorney in Spartanburg, SC

In the past, "dram shops" referred to bars and liquor stores that sold small quantities of whiskey or liquor. The issue arose when patrons, who had been served at these establishments, got involved in car accidents while driving, resulting in injuries. In today's context, drunk driving accidents often cause severe or catastrophic injuries. Unfortunately, many drunk drivers have inadequate insurance to cover the damages and injuries sustained by victims.

While South Carolina doesn't have a specific statute for dram shop claims, state courts allow injured victims to seek damages and recovery from alcohol-related accidents using the state's alcohol sale statutes and negligence laws. Consequently, it's possible to hold restaurants, bars, and other entities accountable for injuries sustained by the driver of a motor vehicle or boat.

 Personal Injury Lawyer Spartanburg, SC

The Dram Shop Injury Attorney in Spartanburg, SC You Can Trust

Most adults know that driving under the influence isn't just dumb - it's downright dangerous. They know that DUIs often have long-lasting, traumatic effects for everyone involved. What many people don't know is how closely related DUI and dram shop cases are in South Carolina. Consider the following scenarios:

Perhaps a 24-hour gas station doesn't check an I.D. and sells a case of malt liquor to a minor. The minor becomes intoxicated, and with a blood alcohol level exceeding the state limit, the novice driver wrecks their vehicle. One person is killed, and another is seriously injured. Or, in another instance, a bartender gives an overtly intoxicated person one last drink before they leave. The bartender later finds out that the person they served caused a car accident and injured a family of four.

In South Carolina, there are no specific dram shop statutes in place. Nevertheless, the state's courts strive to offer protection to individuals who have suffered injuries due to a drunk driver. However, filing dram shop claims, proving negligence, and navigating insurance coverage can be complicated and frustrating. That's especially true when you're hurt due to no fault of your own, and you're just trying to get through the recovery process. If you've sustained injuries from a drunk driver and believe that the person's intoxication was caused by a third party, it's time to call a dram shop law firm like Lauren Taylor Law.

Dram shop injury victims choose Lauren Taylor and her team of lawyers because they don't shy away from challenging tavern-keeper liability cases. With exceptional investigative skills, they meticulously gather relevant facts, ask hard questions, and build claims that focus on the most favorable outcomes possible.   

 Bar And Restaurant Liability Spartanburg, SC

Experience Matters with Dram Shop Cases in South Carolina

Here at Lauren Taylor Law, we've dedicated our legal careers to assisting individuals in finding solutions to challenging legal issues. We're not in the business of prioritizing quick settlements that don't serve our clients' best interests. With decades of combined trial experience, we're passionate about getting you the compensation you deserve and feel privileged to be your dram shop injury lawyer. If you've been hurt by a drunk driver and believe that the driver's intoxication was due to a third party's negligence, get in touch with our dram shop liability lawyers. We can work together to determine if a third party can be held legally responsible.

Top 5 Reasons to Hire a Dram Shop Injury Attorney in Spartanburg, SC

Dram shop laws in South Carolina are complex, and the situations leading up to a trial or court case can be nuanced and confusing. Having a reliable, compassionate lawyer by your side is the best way to understand the situation you're in and fight for the compensation you deserve. Here are just a few of the most significant reasons why you should consider hiring a dram shop lawyer:

1. Advanced Knowledge of South Carolina Dram Shop Law and Precedents

You can rely on your dram shop lawyer to use legal precedents to demonstrate that the establishment licensee failed to fulfill their legal responsibilities to ensure the safety of patrons and the public. Precedent refers to the extensive body of previous dram shop lawsuit rulings in South Carolina that a court must consider when making decisions.

3. Obtain Maximum Compensation for You and Your Family

If you've experienced a serious accident that has impacted your financial and personal well-being, financial compensation can provide some relief. A dram shop injury lawyer can help you seek compensation for a variety of issues, which we'll cover in detail later. In cases where you have lost a spouse in a fatal accident, your lawyer can also help create a compensation proposal that considers the loss of financial and emotional support from that person.

2. Meticulous Evidence Gathering

In South Carolina dram shop cases, the court needs evidence that the bar or restaurant served too much alcohol to the customer. Evidence can come in various forms. Your dram shop attorney can handle this thorough and time-consuming task so you don't have to.

In addition to evidence gathering, you'll need an attorney to demonstrate that the person's intoxication directly caused the injuries or property damage in question. Your attorney will gather evidence linking the intoxicated individual to the harm. This meticulous legal work is best performed by a lawyer with experience in dram shop liability, who can fill in the missing timeline details of the day of the incident.

4. Help Deal with Insurance Companies

Insurance can help cover medical expenses, property damage, and other losses resulting from an incident. Unfortunately, dealing with insurers when you're already suffering from a serious injury or personal loss can be overwhelming. Hiring a dram shop lawyer not only simplifies this process but also helps ensure you receive all the benefits entitled to you under your policy.

5. Fighting for Your Rights in Court

Your dram shop lawyer should prioritize your best interests. Sometimes, that involves negotiating a fair settlement with the alcohol-serving establishment. Other times, the best outcomes come in court. Every dram shop accident claim is unique and requires individual consideration. Effectively presenting a case in front of a judge or jury is a specialized skill possessed by experienced litigators. When you hire an experienced, proactive dram shop injury attorney in Spartanburg, SC, you can rest easy knowing you'll have strong representation in both private negotiations and in the courtroom.

South Carolina Dram Shop Law 101

Today, dram shop laws hold establishments accountable for serving alcohol to intoxicated customers who cause harm. If a bar or restaurant serves alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person who then causes a DUI accident, the establishment can be held liable for resulting injuries. The injured party can also pursue legal action against the intoxicated driver. Dram shop laws would also apply if the intoxicated patron caused harm or damage in a manner other than a car accident.

These Establishments are Liable for Dram Shop Injury Laws

Dram shop laws are legal statutes that hold businesses accountable for serving alcohol to individuals who are already intoxicated or for selling alcohol to minors who then cause harm to themselves or others. If a business has a commercial liquor license or equivalent in South Carolina, liability may be incurred. Some of the most common types of businesses that incur dram shop liability include the following:

  • Taverns and Bars
  • Liquor Stores
  • Restaurants
  • Hotels
  • Country Clubs
  • Night Clubs
  • Lounges
  • Gentleman's Clubs and Strip Clubs
  • Caterers

In the settings above, the establishment bears liability depending on the actions of their employees. Servers and other staff members who overserve intoxicated customers may be considered negligent. Some common staff positions that can be at fault under South Carolina dram shop law include managers, cashiers, store clerks, bartenders, and servers.

Proving Negligence in Dram Shop Injury Cases

After an intoxicated driver causes an accident that injures another person, the victim can seek compensation from the establishment that overserved the intoxicated person. To successfully recover compensation in a dram shop case, your dram shop injury attorney in Spartanburg, SC must prove that the business was negligent or intentional in serving a minor or an intoxicated person. At Lauren Taylor Law, our goal is to prove negligence in your dram shop case so that we may recover the maximum amount of damages to help you recover.

To do so, we aim to demonstrate the following

sustained

The injuries you sustained were primarily caused by the alcohol consumed by the intoxicated driver, which can be proven if the driver is found guilty of driving under the influence (DUI).

fulfill

The establishment failed to fulfill its obligations to recognize intoxicated patrons, verify legal drinking age with I.D., refrain from serving alcohol to intoxicated or underage individuals, and arrange for safe transportation for intoxicated customers.

establishment

The establishment must have had a reasonable awareness that the customer was either intoxicated or underage. Checking the customer's I.D. can help establish their legal age. The level of intoxication can be assessed by observing the behavior of the individual or by tracking the number and type of drinks served to them within a specific period.

 Alcohol-related Injury Attorney Spartanburg, SC

How to Prove Evidence of Dram Shop Negligence

As your dram shop injury attorney in Spartanburg, SC, one of our biggest jobs is supplying evidence proving that the dram shop in question was negligent. Examples of supporting evidence include the following:

Knowledge of Intoxication Evidence

The plaintiff and attorney must demonstrate that the alcohol establishment was aware or should have been aware that the customer was drunk, by showing that the bar had knowledge of intoxication or should have observed visible signs of drunkenness. Knowledge of intoxication can include knowing:

  • How many alcoholic drinks were consumed
  • The types of alcoholic drinks that were consumed
  • The time frame during which the individual drank the alcohol

Visible signs of intoxication can include:

  • Aggressive behavior
  • Slurred Speech
  • Staggering while moving
  • Passing out
  • Slurred Speech
  • Disorientation

Duty of Care Evidence

Every business has an inherent responsibility to adhere to state law and refrain from serving individuals who are either under the legal drinking age or visibly intoxicated.

Evidence

Breach of Duty Evidence

Proving that the establishment breached its duty to serve alcohol responsibly and follow the law can include showing that the establishment's employees:

  • Did not ask for I.D. prior to serving or selling drinks
  • Didn't identify the intoxicated customer when visible signs were present
  • Continued to serve the intoxicated person alcohol, despite them knowing that the patron was intoxicated
Causation

Causation Evidence

An attorney can gather evidence to show that alcohol intoxication directly caused a drunk driving accident or injury by reviewing police reports, arrest records, and court documents. A conviction for DUI, DUAC, or any other alcohol-related offense can serve as compelling proof for legal action.

Convictions

Do DUI Convictions Help Support Dram Shop Liability Cases?

The short answer to this question is yes. A DUI or DUAC conviction can serve as crucial evidence to support a dram shop liability or drunk driving claim for compensation. Being convicted provides concrete proof that the driver failed in their duty of care, leading to subsequent injuries due to negligence. It's advantageous for victims to enlist a qualified dram shop injury attorney in Spartanburg, SC to handle their dram shop liability case. Quality dram shop lawyers - like those at Lauren Taylor Law - conduct investigations into the source of the driver's intoxication and ascertain if any establishment contributed to over-serving the driver.

Limitations

Is There a Statute of Limitations in South Carolina Dram Shop Cases?

In dram shop liability cases, which are considered personal injury cases, the state allows a three-year window from the date of injury for victims to file a lawsuit against the bar that overserved a patron. If the filing deadline is missed, the judge may dismiss the case unless there is a valid legal exception. If you're thinking about taking legal action, it's important to reach out to Laurent Taylor Law as soon as possible to explore your options.

What Types of Damages Can a Dram Shop Injury Attorney in Spartanburg, SC Win?

South Carolina state law ensures that victims of negligence have a way to obtain financial recovery after being injured in a bar or due to the actions of a negligent establishment. It's important to note that not only the victims of drunk driving accidents but anyone injured by an intoxicated person can file a dram shop liability claim. Compensation from dram shop cases can come from a variety of sources, including those below.

Liquor Liability Insurance

In South Carolina, businesses with an alcohol license are required to have at least one million dollars in liquor liability insurance. This insurance covers both economic and non-economic damages suffered by a victim.

Recoverable Damages

If you're the victim of a DUI accident, you can recover economic damages under dram shop liability. Those damages can include the following:

  • Lost income from missed work
  • Medical bills and expenses
  • Physical therapy
  • Reduced earning ability due to injury
  • Occupational therapy
  • Property or vehicle damage
  • Cost of travel
  • Counseling for mental health
  • Other required services

You may also be eligible for non-economic damages in a dram shop liability claim. Those damages may include one or more of the following:

  • Diminished quality of life
  • Disfigurement
  • Physical suffering and pain like broken bones or a traumatic brain injury
  • Emotional distress and depression
  • Inconvenience
  • Loss of enjoyment of activities
 Legal Consultation For Dram Shop Injuries Spartanburg, SC

Punitive Damages

You can also seek punitive damages in a South Carolina dram shop liability case. These damages are awarded to punish a defendant for causing harm due to reckless, willful, or wanton misconduct. Your dram shop lawyer in South Carolina must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant's actions met the criteria described in the statute. The burden of proof is higher than that required to win compensatory damages in a dram shop liability case.

In drunk driving accidents, courts may consider awarding punitive damages because driving while intoxicated is a deliberate violation of the law that displays a reckless disregard for others. Unlike in most other cases where punitive damages are capped, South Carolina does not limit the amount awarded in a drunk driving case.

What Clients Say About Us

When It's Time to Hire a Dram Shop Injury Attorney in Spartanburg, SC Call Lauren Taylor

If you've been injured due to another person's negligence and you're ready to fight for damages, it's time to call Lauren Taylor Law. Let our team of dram shop injury lawyers litigate your case and secure maximum compensation for your lost wages, hospital bills, property damage, and other losses. When you partner with a proven, experienced, successful attorney, you can increase your chances of getting full compensation.

We have the skills and trial experience needed to handle complex dram shop claims, just like yours. To learn more about your alcohol-related accident and the opportunity to bring a lawsuit against a dram shop, contact us today to schedule a consultation at the law offices of Lauren Taylor.

Do You Have a Case?

Free Consultation. No Obligation. Completely Confidential

shield

We guarantee 100% privacy. Your information will NOT be shared.

Latest News in Spartanburg, SC

Another potential measles exposure at Spartanburg Costco

The South Carolina Department of Public Health (DPH) is reporting six new cases of measles in the state since Tuesday, bringing the total number of cases in South Carolina related to the Upstate outbreak to 985.There are currently 61 people in quarantine and two in isolation. The latest end of quarantine for these is March 20.Based on the new cases, DPH has identified public exposures at Sugar Ridge Elementary (fewer than five individuals in quarantine). Additionally, individuals remain in quarantine from Libertas Academy (17 i...

The South Carolina Department of Public Health (DPH) is reporting six new cases of measles in the state since Tuesday, bringing the total number of cases in South Carolina related to the Upstate outbreak to 985.

There are currently 61 people in quarantine and two in isolation. The latest end of quarantine for these is March 20.

Based on the new cases, DPH has identified public exposures at Sugar Ridge Elementary (fewer than five individuals in quarantine). Additionally, individuals remain in quarantine from Libertas Academy (17 individuals in quarantine), Willow Creek Gathers Homeschool Co-op (17 individuals in quarantine) and Mabry Middle School (fewer than five individuals in quarantine).

DPH has identified a new public location where exposures to infectious measles have occurred. DPH has defined the time of potential exposure at the following location:

The risk of exposure in these locations is limited to the specific dates and times announced. Once that time frame has passed, the location is not an ongoing risk for measles exposure. Exposures occurred only when an infectious person was present during the defined time. These locations are not a source of ongoing exposure, and businesses and locations identified are not responsible for a person with measles having been present.

People who were exposed at Costco, especially those without immunity through vaccination or previous disease, should monitor for symptoms through March 15.

Vaccination continues to be the best way to prevent measles and stop this outbreak. Vaccines are available at many primary care provider offices and pharmacies, as well as DPH Health Departments.

DPH has received requests for Mobile Health Unit services to offer measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination and has scheduled an event provide MMR vaccines to the public at no cost on Tuesday, March 3 from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. at Grace Community Church, 570 Magnolia Street, Spartanburg.

To stay up-to-date on the latest measles outbreak information, visit our dedicated webpage here. For additional data related to the outbreak, visit our Measles Dashboard.

Outbreak Data PointsAge breakdown of 985 cases:Under 5: 2585-17: 63318+: 85Unknown: 9

Vaccination status:919 unvaccinated, 19 partially vaccinated with one of the recommended two-dose MMR sequence, 26 vaccinated with the two-dose MMR sequence, and 21 unknown.

TigerDC won’t build $3B data center after Spartanburg leaders sour on tax break offer

SPARTANBURG — In the wake of local officials pulling support for steep property tax cuts amid a public uproar, TigerDC has decided not to build a $3 billion data center in Spartanburg County.“Project Spero remains appreciative of the time and engagement shown by County Council, staff, and community members during this review,” the company stated in a Feb. 27 press release. “Major infrastructure investments require alignment among stakeholders, and Project Spero recognizes that alignment ultimately has not been ...

SPARTANBURG — In the wake of local officials pulling support for steep property tax cuts amid a public uproar, TigerDC has decided not to build a $3 billion data center in Spartanburg County.

“Project Spero remains appreciative of the time and engagement shown by County Council, staff, and community members during this review,” the company stated in a Feb. 27 press release. “Major infrastructure investments require alignment among stakeholders, and Project Spero recognizes that alignment ultimately has not been achieved.”

The announcement came two hours before a Feb. 27 county council vote against offering a property tax abatement to the company.

“We’re thrilled with this no vote by our County Council,” said Eric Allison, a retired Spartanburg native who started the No Data Centers in Spartanburg Facebook page to give a voice to folks concerned about Spero and other projects.

“That’s what we wanted all along, was for our elected representatives to hear the voices of the people that elected them and then vote accordingly to the residents’ wishes,” Allison said.

Councilmember Monier Abusaft, who voted to approve the deal on second reading, said he was personally comfortable with the data center and didn’t believe it would have any adverse effects.

But he said the community opposition and the state’s ongoing debate over data center regulations were the determining factors that caused County Council back off from the project. He said the statewide debate would give people a chance to get more information on data centers from trustworthy sources.

“Obviously, they’re safe because we’ve already approved some,” Abusaft said. “Nobody’s walking around here with two heads. The water’s going to be clean. But when people are distrustful, sometimes, local government just needs to say ‘Let’s stop and let them get as comfortable as we are.’ ”

Spartanburg County Council in November passed the first of three readings of an ordinance to give the company a fee-in-lieu-of-tax agreement that would lower its property tax rate from 10.5 percent down to 4 percent for the next 40 years.

On Jan. 8 and 9, members of the council’s economic development committee met with TigerDC CEO Jerry Tang and his project team, county spokesperson Scottie Kay Blackwell said. They also formally pledged to Spartanburg County Council that the project would comply with any state or federal data center regulations.

Council tabled a planned second reading over community concerns, but on Jan. 27, TigerDC announced in a news release that it was coming to Spartanburg. That announcement tried to ease worries about power and water usage.

As it announced its withdrawal, TigerDC said its team had “worked diligently and in good faith” to provide extensive documentation and public clarification regarding the facility’s design — stressing that Project Spero uses a closed-loop cooling system with negligible water impact and a self-contained power strategy they said was designed to avoid strain on the local residential grid.

Council Chair Manning Lynch said he met with Tang once for about 45 minutes as part of the vetting process.

At county leadership’s request, the developer also publicly launched the TigerDC brand and identified the company well in advance of final FILOT approval — an unusual move during a confidential economic development process.

“TigerDC has operated responsibly in Spartanburg County since 2022 and remains proud of our existing presence here,” the press release stated. “Project Spero represented a significant private investment that would have generated substantial long-term tax revenue while strengthening America’s leadership in AI and advanced computing. TigerDC will now focus our efforts on communities that are ready to move forward with this type of infrastructure.”

On Feb. 16, in the face of raucous opposition from the community, environmental advocates and local power player The Johnson Group, council passed second reading of the ordinance anyway, with Paul Abbott and Grant DeShields voting no.

A week later — as the Facebook groups swelled, the petition signatures increased and a website called stopprojectspero.com went live — the fractures deepened.

Lynch and Abusaft, who’d both voted yes on second reading, announced they would vote no on third reading, resulting in a hypothetical 4-3 vote against the FILOT. Without the deal, county officials said, the company wouldn’t set up shop.

On Feb. 26, councilmembers held a news conference flanked by state legislators where they announced their intention to vote against the FILOT and let the state take the lead in regulating data centers.

As it announced the project’s end, the company said it was “deeply grateful to the local business leaders, community partners, technical experts, and residents who engaged thoughtfully throughout this process.”

“Our commitment to building secure, responsible digital infrastructure that supports American innovation and national competitiveness remains unchanged,” TigerDC said.

Data center project proposal advances after heated meeting in Spartanburg County

SPARTANBURG, S.C. —A large data center project is moving forward in Spartanburg County. The project, titled "Project Sperro," would create a data center facility proposing over $3 billion of investment and 50 new jobs.Monday's meeting saw a line nearly out of the front doors at the Spartanburg County office building, and people piled into the hallway that couldn’t get into the county chambers. The meeting was frequently interrupted with shouting and boos from the audience.A crowd po...

SPARTANBURG, S.C. —

A large data center project is moving forward in Spartanburg County. The project, titled "Project Sperro," would create a data center facility proposing over $3 billion of investment and 50 new jobs.

Monday's meeting saw a line nearly out of the front doors at the Spartanburg County office building, and people piled into the hallway that couldn’t get into the county chambers. The meeting was frequently interrupted with shouting and boos from the audience.

A crowd poured into the hallway since the chambers reached capacity. A loud portion of the crowd voiced concern over the development.

"We're going to be the ones paying for it. How can you look at us after we've put you in office and be like 'screw y'all because we don't care.' We're the ones that pay the bills. All of these people in here, and no one cares? What is that?" said Spartanburg Resident Allison Herb during public comment.

Other public speakers voiced support for the development.

"It's a low-demand system. It's state-of-the-art. When people are asleep. When people are asleep. It uses power. It uses power. It doesn't use power when you need to cook, wash, and clean. And then that loads the power companies' pocket up with more money so they can lower your power bill. So you don't have to pay another $50," said another resident, Greg Hill.

The council voted 5 to 2 to move the proposal into third reading.

"I think that this is a bad business deal. I think we can get more than 4% if council chooses to pass it. This is an industry that makes millions and, for people making money, but we give a tax rate to residential. I just don't think that's the best business deal we can make," said Councilman Paul Abott.

"Information that I've received that these systems are like the radiator in your car; one - they're very efficient, they use a total amount less than a lowes or a Home Depot, and that ones the system fills up, like a radiator that works properly, you don't fill them up again," said Councilman Mo Abusaft.

Right now, South Carolina lawmakers are debating a proposed bill, S.867, that would change how the state regulates data center development.

Keep up with what's happening around our area by downloading the WYFF News 4 app on the App Store or Google Play.

Data center one step closer to reality after Spartanburg County Council approval

SPARTANBURG COUNTY, S.C. (FOX Carolina) - Spartanburg County Council approved the second reading of Project Spero in a 5-2 vote Tuesday night, advancing the proposed $3 billion artificial intelligence data center despite outpouring of public opposition.The council meeting lasted nearly four hours as hundreds of residents packed council chambers to voice concerns about the high-performance AI data center planned for Tyger River Industrial Park along Highway 290.Council members Grant DeShields of District 4 and Paul Abbott of Dis...

SPARTANBURG COUNTY, S.C. (FOX Carolina) - Spartanburg County Council approved the second reading of Project Spero in a 5-2 vote Tuesday night, advancing the proposed $3 billion artificial intelligence data center despite outpouring of public opposition.

The council meeting lasted nearly four hours as hundreds of residents packed council chambers to voice concerns about the high-performance AI data center planned for Tyger River Industrial Park along Highway 290.

Council members Grant DeShields of District 4 and Paul Abbott of District 3 voted against the project.

Energy concerns dominate hearing

The top concerns raised by residents included energy costs, health issues and environmental impacts from the proposed facility.

Council chambers can hold about 160 people, but the crowd was so large deputies asked some attendees to listen from the lobby. The line wrapped around to the front entrance.

Most residents who spoke opposed the project, particularly citing concerns about electricity costs and grid strain.

“They are raising rates now, so what happens when a huge data center comes in and they suck the power?” one resident said.

Another resident addressed council members directly.

“That’s going to be a strain on our water supply, our electricity, on our gas bill. And you’re going to pass that to us,” the resident said during the public hearing. “How can you look at us when we put you in office?”

Federal power request denied

Many residents in the surrounding area receive power from Lockhart Power and Duke Energy.

Data centers typically require large amounts of electricity. Lockhart Power, which receives some of its electricity from Duke Energy, asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for access to an additional 200 megawatts of power—enough to supply about 160,000 homes. The additional power would require about $40 million in system upgrades.

Federal regulators denied that request in December, saying the costs could end up being passed on to customers in the long run.

Support for Spero

A small group of residents spoke in support of the project, saying it could bring millions of dollars in investment to the county.

“It represents a massive private investment in our county and will generate millions of dollars in new tax revenue every year,” one supporter said. “That revenue can help support public safety [and other services].”

Split vote

Before council members voted, Councilman Mo Abusaft, who supported the project, addressed the audience.

“I know there are people on this council who have opposite positions. [But] they don’t talk about Project Spero the way you talked about it today,” Abusaft said. “I don’t know if you’re aiding your cause based on the way you’re engaging with people.”

Abbott, who voted against the project, spoke about potential energy price hikes.

“I’m not an electrician, and I don’t understand the grid,” Abbott said. “But I do understand when the power goes off. Based on the notice that was sent out, our grid may not be as strong as I thought it was.”

He was referring to a Duke Energy notice urging customers to reduce heat usage during the recent ice storm to avoid adding strain to the grid.

Other council members said they met with Duke Energy representatives, who told them costs would not be passed on to residents. Project officials say the facility would self-generate part of its energy needs.

Project Spero now heads to County Council for a third and final vote at a later date.

Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with FOX Carolina. For more free content like this, .

Measles outbreak in South Carolina reaches 920 cases

State health officials are reporting 44 new cases of measles in the state since Tuesday, bringing the total number of cases in South Carolina related to the Upstate outbreak to 920.The South Carolina Department of Public Health (DPH) said there are currently 277 people in quarantine and eight in isolation. The latest end of quarantine for these is March 2.As of Feb. 6, 840 of those infected are unvaccinated; 20 are partially vaccinated; 24 are fully vaccinated and the vaccination status of 36 is unknown.Spartanburg Count...

State health officials are reporting 44 new cases of measles in the state since Tuesday, bringing the total number of cases in South Carolina related to the Upstate outbreak to 920.

The South Carolina Department of Public Health (DPH) said there are currently 277 people in quarantine and eight in isolation. The latest end of quarantine for these is March 2.

As of Feb. 6, 840 of those infected are unvaccinated; 20 are partially vaccinated; 24 are fully vaccinated and the vaccination status of 36 is unknown.

Spartanburg County has the highest number of cases, which is currently at 879.

DPH has identified numerous locations where exposures to infectious measles may have occurred. DPH has defined the times of potential exposure at the following locations:

The risk of exposure in the locations is limited to the specific dates and times announced. Once that time frame has passed, the location is not an ongoing risk for measles exposure. Exposures occurred only when an infectious person was present during the defined time. These locations are not a source of ongoing exposure, and businesses and locations identified are not responsible for a person with measles having been present.

People who were exposed at Rick Erwin’s Level 10 Restaurant, Boost Mobile and the Social Security Administration, especially those without immunity through vaccination or previous disease, should monitor for symptoms through Feb. 19. Those exposed at Target should monitor for symptoms through Feb. 20.

Vaccination continues to be the best way to prevent measles and stop this outbreak. Vaccines are available at many primary care provider offices and pharmacies, as well as DPH Health Departments.

In January 2026, there was a strong increase in measles vaccinations across the state and in Spartanburg, where the outbreak is centered. Over 16,800 doses of measles vaccine were administered statewide, an increase of more than 7,000 doses compared to January 2025, a 72% increase. In Spartanburg County, there was a 162% increase in doses administered in January 2026 as compared to January 2025. Almost 1,200 doses of MMR were administered statewide to infants aged 6-11 months in January. These doses given earlier than the routine schedule that begins at 12 months are recommended for infants in an outbreak setting and are essential to protecting the most vulnerable children.

“January was the best month for measles vaccination we’ve experienced during this outbreak,” said Dr. Linda Bell, state epidemiologist and DPH’s Health Programs Branch director and incident commander for the measles outbreak.

In response to the ongoing measles outbreak in the Upstate, DPH will activate its Mobile Health Unit to offer measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination to the public at no cost on:

Disclaimer:

This website publishes news articles that contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The non-commercial use of these news articles for the purposes of local news reporting constitutes "Fair Use" of the copyrighted materials as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
 Victim Of Intoxication Spartanburg, SC

Service Areas