In the past, "dram shops" referred to bars and liquor stores that sold small quantities of whiskey or liquor. The issue arose when patrons, who had been served at these establishments, got involved in car accidents while driving, resulting in injuries. In today's context, drunk driving accidents often cause severe or catastrophic injuries. Unfortunately, many drunk drivers have inadequate insurance to cover the damages and injuries sustained by victims.
While South Carolina doesn't have a specific statute for dram shop claims, state courts allow injured victims to seek damages and recovery from alcohol-related accidents using the state's alcohol sale statutes and negligence laws. Consequently, it's possible to hold restaurants, bars, and other entities accountable for injuries sustained by the driver of a motor vehicle or boat.
Most adults know that driving under the influence isn't just dumb - it's downright dangerous. They know that DUIs often have long-lasting, traumatic effects for everyone involved. What many people don't know is how closely related DUI and dram shop cases are in South Carolina. Consider the following scenarios:
Perhaps a 24-hour gas station doesn't check an I.D. and sells a case of malt liquor to a minor. The minor becomes intoxicated, and with a blood alcohol level exceeding the state limit, the novice driver wrecks their vehicle. One person is killed, and another is seriously injured. Or, in another instance, a bartender gives an overtly intoxicated person one last drink before they leave. The bartender later finds out that the person they served caused a car accident and injured a family of four.
In South Carolina, there are no specific dram shop statutes in place. Nevertheless, the state's courts strive to offer protection to individuals who have suffered injuries due to a drunk driver. However, filing dram shop claims, proving negligence, and navigating insurance coverage can be complicated and frustrating. That's especially true when you're hurt due to no fault of your own, and you're just trying to get through the recovery process. If you've sustained injuries from a drunk driver and believe that the person's intoxication was caused by a third party, it's time to call a dram shop law firm like Lauren Taylor Law.
Dram shop injury victims choose Lauren Taylor and her team of lawyers because they don't shy away from challenging tavern-keeper liability cases. With exceptional investigative skills, they meticulously gather relevant facts, ask hard questions, and build claims that focus on the most favorable outcomes possible.
Here at Lauren Taylor Law, we've dedicated our legal careers to assisting individuals in finding solutions to challenging legal issues. We're not in the business of prioritizing quick settlements that don't serve our clients' best interests. With decades of combined trial experience, we're passionate about getting you the compensation you deserve and feel privileged to be your dram shop injury lawyer. If you've been hurt by a drunk driver and believe that the driver's intoxication was due to a third party's negligence, get in touch with our dram shop liability lawyers. We can work together to determine if a third party can be held legally responsible.
Dram shop laws in South Carolina are complex, and the situations leading up to a trial or court case can be nuanced and confusing. Having a reliable, compassionate lawyer by your side is the best way to understand the situation you're in and fight for the compensation you deserve. Here are just a few of the most significant reasons why you should consider hiring a dram shop lawyer:
You can rely on your dram shop lawyer to use legal precedents to demonstrate that the establishment licensee failed to fulfill their legal responsibilities to ensure the safety of patrons and the public. Precedent refers to the extensive body of previous dram shop lawsuit rulings in South Carolina that a court must consider when making decisions.
If you've experienced a serious accident that has impacted your financial and personal well-being, financial compensation can provide some relief. A dram shop injury lawyer can help you seek compensation for a variety of issues, which we'll cover in detail later. In cases where you have lost a spouse in a fatal accident, your lawyer can also help create a compensation proposal that considers the loss of financial and emotional support from that person.
In South Carolina dram shop cases, the court needs evidence that the bar or restaurant served too much alcohol to the customer. Evidence can come in various forms. Your dram shop attorney can handle this thorough and time-consuming task so you don't have to.
In addition to evidence gathering, you'll need an attorney to demonstrate that the person's intoxication directly caused the injuries or property damage in question. Your attorney will gather evidence linking the intoxicated individual to the harm. This meticulous legal work is best performed by a lawyer with experience in dram shop liability, who can fill in the missing timeline details of the day of the incident.
Insurance can help cover medical expenses, property damage, and other losses resulting from an incident. Unfortunately, dealing with insurers when you're already suffering from a serious injury or personal loss can be overwhelming. Hiring a dram shop lawyer not only simplifies this process but also helps ensure you receive all the benefits entitled to you under your policy.
Your dram shop lawyer should prioritize your best interests. Sometimes, that involves negotiating a fair settlement with the alcohol-serving establishment. Other times, the best outcomes come in court. Every dram shop accident claim is unique and requires individual consideration. Effectively presenting a case in front of a judge or jury is a specialized skill possessed by experienced litigators. When you hire an experienced, proactive dram shop injury attorney in Summerville, SC, you can rest easy knowing you'll have strong representation in both private negotiations and in the courtroom.
Today, dram shop laws hold establishments accountable for serving alcohol to intoxicated customers who cause harm. If a bar or restaurant serves alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person who then causes a DUI accident, the establishment can be held liable for resulting injuries. The injured party can also pursue legal action against the intoxicated driver. Dram shop laws would also apply if the intoxicated patron caused harm or damage in a manner other than a car accident.
Dram shop laws are legal statutes that hold businesses accountable for serving alcohol to individuals who are already intoxicated or for selling alcohol to minors who then cause harm to themselves or others. If a business has a commercial liquor license or equivalent in South Carolina, liability may be incurred. Some of the most common types of businesses that incur dram shop liability include the following:
In the settings above, the establishment bears liability depending on the actions of their employees. Servers and other staff members who overserve intoxicated customers may be considered negligent. Some common staff positions that can be at fault under South Carolina dram shop law include managers, cashiers, store clerks, bartenders, and servers.
After an intoxicated driver causes an accident that injures another person, the victim can seek compensation from the establishment that overserved the intoxicated person. To successfully recover compensation in a dram shop case, your dram shop injury attorney in Summerville, SC must prove that the business was negligent or intentional in serving a minor or an intoxicated person. At Lauren Taylor Law, our goal is to prove negligence in your dram shop case so that we may recover the maximum amount of damages to help you recover.
To do so, we aim to demonstrate the following
The injuries you sustained were primarily caused by the alcohol consumed by the intoxicated driver, which can be proven if the driver is found guilty of driving under the influence (DUI).
The establishment failed to fulfill its obligations to recognize intoxicated patrons, verify legal drinking age with I.D., refrain from serving alcohol to intoxicated or underage individuals, and arrange for safe transportation for intoxicated customers.
The establishment must have had a reasonable awareness that the customer was either intoxicated or underage. Checking the customer's I.D. can help establish their legal age. The level of intoxication can be assessed by observing the behavior of the individual or by tracking the number and type of drinks served to them within a specific period.
As your dram shop injury attorney in Summerville, SC, one of our biggest jobs is supplying evidence proving that the dram shop in question was negligent. Examples of supporting evidence include the following:
Knowledge of Intoxication Evidence
The plaintiff and attorney must demonstrate that the alcohol establishment was aware or should have been aware that the customer was drunk, by showing that the bar had knowledge of intoxication or should have observed visible signs of drunkenness. Knowledge of intoxication can include knowing:
Visible signs of intoxication can include:
Duty of Care Evidence
Every business has an inherent responsibility to adhere to state law and refrain from serving individuals who are either under the legal drinking age or visibly intoxicated.
Breach of Duty Evidence
Proving that the establishment breached its duty to serve alcohol responsibly and follow the law can include showing that the establishment's employees:
Causation Evidence
An attorney can gather evidence to show that alcohol intoxication directly caused a drunk driving accident or injury by reviewing police reports, arrest records, and court documents. A conviction for DUI, DUAC, or any other alcohol-related offense can serve as compelling proof for legal action.
The short answer to this question is yes. A DUI or DUAC conviction can serve as crucial evidence to support a dram shop liability or drunk driving claim for compensation. Being convicted provides concrete proof that the driver failed in their duty of care, leading to subsequent injuries due to negligence. It's advantageous for victims to enlist a qualified dram shop injury attorney in Summerville, SC to handle their dram shop liability case. Quality dram shop lawyers - like those at Lauren Taylor Law - conduct investigations into the source of the driver's intoxication and ascertain if any establishment contributed to over-serving the driver.
In dram shop liability cases, which are considered personal injury cases, the state allows a three-year window from the date of injury for victims to file a lawsuit against the bar that overserved a patron. If the filing deadline is missed, the judge may dismiss the case unless there is a valid legal exception. If you're thinking about taking legal action, it's important to reach out to Laurent Taylor Law as soon as possible to explore your options.
South Carolina state law ensures that victims of negligence have a way to obtain financial recovery after being injured in a bar or due to the actions of a negligent establishment. It's important to note that not only the victims of drunk driving accidents but anyone injured by an intoxicated person can file a dram shop liability claim. Compensation from dram shop cases can come from a variety of sources, including those below.
In South Carolina, businesses with an alcohol license are required to have at least one million dollars in liquor liability insurance. This insurance covers both economic and non-economic damages suffered by a victim.
If you're the victim of a DUI accident, you can recover economic damages under dram shop liability. Those damages can include the following:
You may also be eligible for non-economic damages in a dram shop liability claim. Those damages may include one or more of the following:
You can also seek punitive damages in a South Carolina dram shop liability case. These damages are awarded to punish a defendant for causing harm due to reckless, willful, or wanton misconduct. Your dram shop lawyer in South Carolina must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant's actions met the criteria described in the statute. The burden of proof is higher than that required to win compensatory damages in a dram shop liability case.
In drunk driving accidents, courts may consider awarding punitive damages because driving while intoxicated is a deliberate violation of the law that displays a reckless disregard for others. Unlike in most other cases where punitive damages are capped, South Carolina does not limit the amount awarded in a drunk driving case.
If you've been injured due to another person's negligence and you're ready to fight for damages, it's time to call Lauren Taylor Law. Let our team of dram shop injury lawyers litigate your case and secure maximum compensation for your lost wages, hospital bills, property damage, and other losses. When you partner with a proven, experienced, successful attorney, you can increase your chances of getting full compensation.
We have the skills and trial experience needed to handle complex dram shop claims, just like yours. To learn more about your alcohol-related accident and the opportunity to bring a lawsuit against a dram shop, contact us today to schedule a consultation at the law offices of Lauren Taylor.
Free Consultation. No Obligation. Completely Confidential
We guarantee 100% privacy. Your information will NOT be shared.
SUMMERVILLE, S.C. (WCIV) — A series of small earthquakes over the past week has startled residents across Summerville and parts of the Lowcountry, marking an unusually active stretch for an area that typically feels only a handful of noticeable tremors each year.Three earthquakes were confirmed near Summerville in just seven days, prompting concern, conversation, and questions about what’s happening beneath the ground, even though no injuries or major damage were reported.For many neighbors, the earthquakes came wit...
SUMMERVILLE, S.C. (WCIV) — A series of small earthquakes over the past week has startled residents across Summerville and parts of the Lowcountry, marking an unusually active stretch for an area that typically feels only a handful of noticeable tremors each year.
Three earthquakes were confirmed near Summerville in just seven days, prompting concern, conversation, and questions about what’s happening beneath the ground, even though no injuries or major damage were reported.
For many neighbors, the earthquakes came without warning. Shirlene, a mom and longtime Summerville resident of 35 years, said the experience was frightening, unlike anything she remembers feeling before.
“That was scary,” she said. “Because it made the house move, and the sound was so loud.”
She recalled being shaken awake as her home shifted.
“I was scared. I was afraid — especially the house shift and my bed,” Shirlene said. “And the sound — it was really scary.”
Other residents reported similar experiences, describing houses shaking for several seconds and loud noises that sounded like explosions. One neighbor’s Ring doorbell camera even captured audio from the moment the earthquake struck, with a booming sound clearly audible in the recording.
Jessica, another Summerville resident, said she felt and heard one of the quakes while at work. “I happened to be working at the library, and I was just exiting the bathroom when I felt this shaking and heard it too,” she said. “I thought, ‘Well, that’s not the HVAC.’”
According to officials, the most recent quake was recorded early Monday morning in Dorchester County near the Kings Grant area. That tremor measured a magnitude 1.6. Before that, a stronger 2.9 magnitude earthquake struck late Saturday night, just before 10:40 p.m., rattling homes across the Tri-County area. Its shallow depth made it more noticeable to residents, even though experts classified it as minor.
The first quake in the series occurred Tuesday afternoon, measuring magnitude 2.3. Residents reported shaking and loud noises, but no damage.
Local civil and structural engineer Gene Brislin, who also lives in Summerville, says the earthquakes are the result of stress being released deep beneath the Earth’s surface. “We are in a bad spot,” Brislin explained. “As stresses build up, the crack gets a little bigger, there’s some stress relief, and we get vibrations. That’s what happened in Summerville.”
Brislin says tectonic plates, massive slabs of rock beneath the Earth’s surface, are constantly moving. Most of the time, that movement goes unnoticed. But along cracks in the Earth’s crust, known as fault lines, plates can become stuck. One of those fault lines runs through the Lowcountry. As stress builds and is released in smaller bursts, residents may feel minor earthquakes.
“The threshold for the smaller ones to occur in terms of stress is much lower,” Brislin said. “In my opinion, the more smaller ones we have, the better off we are.”
Experts stress that these minor earthquakes are not necessarily a sign of a larger event to come.
“Many times, it’s not indicative of some bigger event that’s going to occur,” Brislin said. “It’s just a sign of this bad spot that we’re in.”
Brislin says helicorders are devices used to record seismic signals from a seismometer. Each line of data represents a specific time interval, allowing for the visualization of seismic activity over time.
Officials say South Carolina experiences dozens of earthquakes each year, most of them too small to be felt. While the recent activity has drawn attention, there are no reports of injuries or significant damage.
Still, emergency officials encourage residents to:
Some neighbors said the recent shaking prompted them to double-check their insurance policies, just in case. The recent earthquakes have also renewed discussion at the State House. State Rep.Gil Gatch says the activity highlights the importance of awareness, especially for people living near fault lines.
“I filed this bill wanting people to just be aware,” Gatch said. “We have dozens and dozens of mini earthquakes that nobody ever knows happen because nobody can really feel them.”
Gatch is the main sponsor of House Bill 3227, which would require insurance companies to notify policyholders about the availability of earthquake insurance, particularly for those living in fault-line areas. The bill has been referred to the Committee on Labor, Commerce, and Industry. Gatch says he hopes lawmakers will act before a more damaging earthquake occurs.
While the recent earthquakes have been unsettling for many, experts emphasize there is no immediate cause for concern.
“These smaller earthquakes are really just signs of where the weak spots in the Earth’s crust are,” Brislin said. For now, neighbors like Shirlene say they’re relieved no one was hurt, but they’ll be paying closer attention the next time their house creaks or the ground feels unsteady.
John Travis Peterson, 38, of Summerville, was the operator of Cane Bay Tire and Auto LLCSUMMERVILLE, S.C. —A South Carolina business owner is accused of continuing to operate his business without a license and threatening an official investigating his business.According to the South Carolina Department of Revenue, John Travis Peterson, 38, of Summerville, was the operator of Cane Bay Tire and Auto LLC, whose retail license was revoked in June 2025.Peterson was arrested on Monday and...
John Travis Peterson, 38, of Summerville, was the operator of Cane Bay Tire and Auto LLC
SUMMERVILLE, S.C. —
A South Carolina business owner is accused of continuing to operate his business without a license and threatening an official investigating his business.
According to the South Carolina Department of Revenue, John Travis Peterson, 38, of Summerville, was the operator of Cane Bay Tire and Auto LLC, whose retail license was revoked in June 2025.
Peterson was arrested on Monday and charged with four counts of furnishing a false tax document and one count each of operating without a retail license, making a threat, and simple assault.
According to warrants, when SCDOR employees returned to the business to provide revocation orders and violation documents to Peterson, Peterson gave a false name and signed the documents using this name on multiple occasions.
He is also accused of making threats and assaulting an SCDOR employee in an attempt to force them to leave the business’s location.
The following is taken from the warrant:
"When the defendant received the written violation, he became enraged, tearing up the notice and telling the victim and his subordinate to leave. The victim and his subordinate left that building and headed towards another building situated on the property to investigate a claim the defendant made of that building being a separate business. Before the victim could get to the front door of the other building, the defendant positioned himself in front of the victim, blocking his access.
"The defendant raised his voice at the victim stating 'I told you to leave. You are going to leave, or I will forcibly remove you.' The defendant kept repeating the phrase 'you are going to leave, or I will force you to leave.'
The defendant is also accused of pushing the SCDOR employee repeatedly with his chest and belly while yelling.
If convicted, Peterson faces a maximum penalty of one year in prison and/or a fine of $5,000 for each count of furnishing a false tax document, 30 days in jail and/or a $500 fine for each of the assault and threat counts, and 30 days in jail and/or a fine of $200 for the charge of operating without a retail license.
SUMMERVILLE — A train derailment the morning of Jan. 10 prompted fears of a potential toxic chemical spill and led authorities to temporarily issue a shelter-in-place directive, which was then lifted by mid-afternoon.A Norfolk Southern train derailed at 9:51 a.m. at 2450 West 5th North St., the local name for U.S. Highway 78, near industrial truck manufacturer KION North America’s Summerville plant.Authorities shut down Highway 78 on the northern end of town, from Industrial Road to Jedburg Road. Dorchester County F...
SUMMERVILLE — A train derailment the morning of Jan. 10 prompted fears of a potential toxic chemical spill and led authorities to temporarily issue a shelter-in-place directive, which was then lifted by mid-afternoon.
A Norfolk Southern train derailed at 9:51 a.m. at 2450 West 5th North St., the local name for U.S. Highway 78, near industrial truck manufacturer KION North America’s Summerville plant.
Authorities shut down Highway 78 on the northern end of town, from Industrial Road to Jedburg Road. Dorchester County Fire Chief Tres Atkinson said that hazmat teams from Norfolk Southern and around the region assessed the scene.
“We have determined that there's no immediate danger to the public other than immediate areas that we’ll be working to mitigate the cars that have come off the track,” he said.
Atkinson said the scene was turned over to Norfolk Southern for remediation and asked area residents to “give those people room to work and do their job and get actual scene cleaned up.”
He noted that the fire department is “maintaining a presence on scene with Norfolk Southern” in case of an emergency.
Though the shelter ordered lifted, officials encouraged residents to avoid the area. Highway 78 will “remain closed for the duration of the incident,” a Facebook post from the Dorchester County Sheriff’s Office said.
Atkinson said the highway would remain closed overnight and that Norfolk Southern had estimated the cleanup would be done “sometime in the morning” Jan. 11.
Kasandra Jenkins, a Norfolk Southern spokesperson, said a tank car involved in the derailment carries chlorobenzene, a toxic chemical, but was empty.
Mayor Russ Touchberry posted a video to the town’s Facebook page informing residents of the derailment and cautioning them to avoid the area. He told the Summerville Journal Scene, a Post and Courier affiliate paper, that he was told the train was “carrying a small amount” of chlorobenzene and there was “potential” for a leak, which is why the shelter-in-place was issued.
Chlorobenzene, a flammable liquid, is widely used as a solvent, degreaser and chemical intermediate in producing dyes, pharmaceuticals and pesticides. It affects the central nervous system with prolonged exposure.
Sheriff’s office spokesperson Steven Wright said Highway 78 will reopen once the impacted railroad tracks reopen. Until then, he said, deputies will be patrolling the area to make sure nobody gets too close to the scene.
“We all have that curiosity sense, but it really delays the process if there are citizens trying to see what's going on,” Wright said. “So, we just encourage people to stay away through the area until it is clear and everything's back up.”
Many of the industrial businesses in the area are regularly closed on Saturdays. Dorchester Paws, which is down the road from the derailment site, operated normally. Adoption Supervisor Jimmie Tedder said that while there wasn't a major impact, animals were kept inside most of the day as a precaution.
When Joslyn Scahill, an office manager at Inspire Gymnastics on Industrial Road, spoke to The Post and Courier around 4 p.m., the sound of train horns could be heard through the phone.
"Did you hear that? I guess it's moving again," Scahill said.
The derailment happened a mile-and-a-half away from the gym. Classes were happening at the time as road closures made getting in and out of the area more difficult.
"It was scary when everyone's phones went off because of the emergency alert," Scahill said. "It said to shelter in place because of an active incident. A lot runs through your mind when you read that. You think of active shooter situations, not a train derailment."
County spokesperson Erin Pomrenke told The Post and Courier that officials aim to “provide the most relevant, accurate information to residents, especially in situations with public safety concerns.” She noted that after the initial alert went out, more updates were posted on the county’s social media pages and provided to media outlets.
“After incidents occur, such as today’s incident, the County assesses approaches to continue to provide our residents with quality service and communication,” she said.
Norfolk Southern’s most-famous train derailment was Feb. 3, 2023, near East Palestine, Ohio. That incident involved 38 derailed cars. The train was carrying toxic chemicals and caught fire. Residents within a one-mile radius were evacuated. Norfolk Southern had to remove more than 167,000 tons of soil and more than 39 million gallons of water from the site due to pollution from the derailment.
A lawsuit filed February 2025 claims that seven residents, including a baby, died as a result of the toxic disaster. The National Transportation Safety Board blamed a defective wheel bearing for the accident.
A 2023 Federal Railroad Administration examination of Norfolk Southern’s safety record over 10 years documented 163 derailments and an average of two hazardous material leaks per year.
For example, a Norfolk Southern train accident in Rossville, Tenn., train yard released about 500 gallons of maelic anhydride, a chemical that can damage eyes and the respiratory tract. The report said that in 2018, a 16-car Norfolk Southern derailment in Loudonville, Ohio, released 30,000 gallons of hazardous liquified petroleum gas into the air.
Norfolk Southern had two train derailments last year.
In February, 20 cars derailed near Attica, Ohio, and leaked alcohol and ethanol, though the local sheriff’s office said there was no public danger. In August, about 10 Norfolk Southern cars derailed near Harrisburg, Pa. The city’s fire chief said there were no hazmat dangers and no injuries.
The Federal Railroad Administration has warned the industry about the dangers of a trend toward smaller crews and longer trains. The latter cause more wear on tracks and are more difficult for a crew to manage.
On Jan. 9, about 12 cars from a Union Pacific train derailed near the Texas-Louisiana border. News organizations report there were no HAZMAT spills.