Most people who buy a home and the land it sits on expect that it will be theirs for as long as they choose to reside there. They may choose to pass that home and land along to children or other family members once they pass. It's a very common scenario, but for some residents of Charleston County, it may not be possible due to a highway expansion. Once the expansion starts, these residents could actually lose their land. And while you wouldn't think such an action would be legal in America, truth is often stranger than fiction.
The newly proposed expansion on Highway 41 will expand the highway to two lanes, increasing it to a total of four lanes on most of the roadway and from two to three lanes near the Phillips Community. The project would also start construction of Laurel Hill Parkway - a two-lane road that intersects through the outskirts of Laurel Hill County Park. For the Phillips Community, which sits adjacent to the highway, it could mean the loss of residents' homes and land that have been in their families for generations.
So, what can people like those in the Phillips Community do? They don't want to lose their homes or bear the burden of significantly more traffic around them. On their own, the options can be dour. But with the help of eminent domain attorneys in Aiken, SC, these families can receive the just compensation they deserve.
Remember that when you purchase or are given a plot of land, your property rights aren't as absolute as you may think. According to the United States Constitution, the government has the authority to take your property under specific circumstances. Essentially, your property rights are not absolute.
What's interesting is that the government's ability to take your property is actually stated in the Constitution. Even though the Constitution states that "private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation," in essence, this means the government can take your property if the intended use is valid and they compensate you fairly. The Supreme Court upheld this view in 1876, interpreting that the government had this power based on the Constitution. Eminent domain was frequently used during the construction of the nation's railroad system, often without sufficient limitations on the government.
Unfortunately, many South Carolina residents end up being on the wrong end of the cost-benefit analysis when it comes to fair compensation. That's why, if the government is trying to take your land, it's so important to get in touch with eminent domain attorneys in Aiken, SC, as soon as possible. That way, you have someone by your side for any legal proceedings or disputes. At Lauren Taylor Law, we have a proven track record of achieving positive outcomes for our clients in cases where the government has failed to fulfill its legal responsibilities.
There are typically two different ways that the government may take your property. Those include:
In both scenarios, you could be forced into litigation in order to protect your rights, even though you had no plans on doing so.
When the government wants to acquire your land, they will typically begin by making a formal offer to buy your property. At this point, you may have the opportunity to negotiate with them. If you decide that selling your property is the best option, it's important to work towards reaching an agreement with the government on the sale price. This isn't always a straightforward process because the government may not be willing to offer you a fair amount.
To determine the price of your property, the government will have their appraiser assess the value of the property. This appraiser functions much like an adjuster for an insurance company, many of whom offer lowball pricing. You should know that you have the right to hire your own appraiser to determine an independent valuation. This is often the best course of action if you're considering selling to the government.
If you choose not to sell to the government, they may proceed by filing a lawsuit to initiate the condemnation process. At this point, you can challenge the taking itself by working with eminent domain attorneys in Aiken, SC. You can also ask the court to determine the fair market value of the property if the government's valuation is lower than what you believe is fair.
Given the history of these cases, you can never trust the government to act fairly. Why? Because local officials often have interests in such matters, and your rights are getting in their way. Sometimes, the only viable route you have is to lawyer up and fight the case in court.
When the government wants to acquire your land, they will typically begin by making a formal offer to buy your property. At this point, you may have the opportunity to negotiate with them. If you decide that selling your property is the best option, it's important to work towards reaching an agreement with the government on the sale price. This isn't always a straightforward process because the government may not be willing to offer you a fair amount.
To determine the price of your property, the government will have their appraiser assess the value of the property. This appraiser functions much like an adjuster for an insurance company, many of whom offer lowball pricing. You should know that you have the right to hire your own appraiser to determine an independent valuation. This is often the best course of action if you're considering selling to the government.
If you choose not to sell to the government, they may proceed by filing a lawsuit to initiate the condemnation process. At this point, you can challenge the taking itself by working with eminent domain attorneys in Aiken, SC. You can also ask the court to determine the fair market value of the property if the government's valuation is lower than what you believe is fair.
While the government can use its power to take your land, there are limits on its ability to do so. Namely:
As such, there are two reasons why you can sue the government as part of an eminent domain case:
Given the history of these cases, you can never trust the government to act fairly. Why? Because local officials often have interests in such matters, and your rights are getting in their way. Sometimes, the only viable route you have is to lawyer up and fight the case in court.
Landowners commonly contest whether the taking is genuinely for public use. There are constraints on the government's actions and the reasons for which they can seize your land. The interpretation of these terms by the courts often favors the government. "Public use" does not simply mean that your property would be open to the general public. Instead, the term is more akin to "for the benefit of the public."
Historically, the government expropriated private lands for projects such as bridges and highways. Numerous legal battles arose during the period when the nation was constructing its railroad system. In these instances, the courts typically interpreted "public use" more broadly.
Some of the most common reasons why government landtaking is upheld include the building of structures like:
These are the more "traditional" uses of eminent domain, where the public use would be less in question. However, the law also permits certain utilities to wield the power of eminent domain. For instance, in a recent case in South Carolina, Dominion Energy was granted the authority to acquire homes in order to construct an energy pipeline.
Regrettably, governments have historically tended to misuse this authority, and some courts have even condoned such actions. As an example, courts in Toledo, Ohio, allowed 83 homes to be taken from residents in order to construct a manufacturing plant for Chrysler, which said the plant would create jobs for the public.
If the government is trying to take your land, you should never give up on your property. By working with eminent domain attorneys in Aiken, SC, you may be able to stop them by challenging the taking itself. You can also challenge the purpose of the taking and argue that the reason for "public use" is really for private use.
Many people worry about the government taking over their entire piece of land. However, in some cases, the government may not need all your property and might not want to compensate you for it. They may only require a portion of your land.
In such instances, the government not only has to pay you for the part of the land they are taking, but they also have to compensate for the decreased value of the remaining land that you still own. Additionally, the government may seek to obtain an easement on your land through eminent domain. This easement could be for utilities or access to another area. Once again, the government must compensate you for the land taken and for the reduction in value of the rest of your property.
In essence, fair market value represents the amount a willing buyer would offer to a seller for their property. While this concept seems straightforward, applying fair market value in reality can be quite challenging. In many instances, negotiating with the government may be necessary to receive proper compensation for your land. Just like any negotiator, the government typically begins with a low offer and anticipates a counteroffer from you to reach a mutual agreement. Rarely does the government present its best offer right from the start.
Several valuations may be considered to determine your property's fair market value:
The amount of income your property could have produced
Comparison of sales to other similar properties in the area that were recently sold (there could be disagreements pertaining to what is comparable)
The amount of money it would cost to replace your property (and the structures built on it) minus depreciation
In reality, during a trial, both you and the government would have valuation experts testify. First, you'd have to choose the relevant valuation, which the government might dispute. Then, you'd need to apply the appropriate valuation method. There might be a significant difference between your numbers and the government's.
However, even if you couldn't prevent the seizure of the property, many have successfully challenged the government's valuation of their property. Property owners have compelled the government to pay more, and our team of eminent domain attorneys in Aiken, SC, has represented many of them in the legal process over the years.
For Any Help, Questions or Suggestions, Contact Us
Typically, you'll receive notice regarding the potential acquisition of your property through a letter. But if you're like the residents of the Phillips Community, you might have already heard murmurs that something might happen to your land. If you suspect or find out that the government plans to take your land through eminent domain, you need the help of seasoned eminent domain attorneys in Aiken, SC, right away.
The truth is that the government can be just as challenging to deal with as an insurance company. Despite your constitutional rights, they might try to conceal information or offer far less compensation than your property is worth.
In an eminent domain lawsuit, you're essentially challenging the government. While some courts might show some level of deference to the government, they are not given free rein to do as they please. It's within your rights to stand up and contest the government's actions if they violate your rights. But to fight back effectively, your best bet is to work with an eminent domain lawyer from Lauren Taylor Law.
Your attorney will assess the best legal approach for your case, which could involve suing the government or vigorously defending against their lawsuit. You could also negotiate compensation, either before or after the case goes to court.
If you receive notice that your property is being targeted for eminent domain action, also known as condemnation, it's important to seek advice from an eminent domain attorney. Many people won't reach out to a lawyer when dealing with this kind of legal issue because they:
Unfortunately, these assumptions are rarely, if ever, true. In fact, you may actually be more vulnerable and at risk than you originally thought. This misunderstanding illustrates exactly why you should enlist the services of a reputable eminent domain attorney. With the assistance of a legal expert who is well-versed in South Carolina eminent domain law, property owners can safeguard their rights and secure maximum compensation.
Here are the top three ways an eminent domain lawyer can help:
It's important to keep in mind that the initial offer from the government for your property is often the lowest amount they think they can get away with. This rarely represents the full and fair compensation you deserve. An attorney has the expertise and resources to ensure that you receive proper compensation for the value of your property, including relocation expenses and more.
In some instances, an eminent domain attorney may be able to secure a higher amount than what the government is proposing. The eminent domain lawyers at Lauren Taylor Law are dedicated to safeguarding your rights and protecting your property
Government agencies are not permitted to simply take any property they desire. According to the 5th Amendment, they must prove that the condemnation is genuinely for public use and meets other specific criteria. You have the right to demand that the state fulfill these criteria before seizing your property. Plus, if only a portion of your property is necessary to complete the project, you have the right to safeguard the ownership of the remaining part of your property.
Eminent domain cases and their related laws can be quite intricate and overwhelming for the average property owner. You shouldn't be expected to grasp all the technical terms, and you certainly shouldn't be penalized for not fully understanding the process. That's why having an experienced eminent domain lawyer by your side is valuable on many levels. A skilled eminent domain attorney will assist you through each stage in plain language that you can grasp. With an eminent domain attorney advocating for you throughout your case to safeguard your rights, you stand a better chance of receiving the compensation you rightfully deserve.
If the government takes your property or prevents you from using it, you have the right to file a lawsuit. The law provides you with the opportunity to stand on equal ground with our government, allowing your lawyer to advocate for your rights in court.
At Lauren Taylor Law, our eminent domain lawyers step in so you don't get pushed around. Our goal is to fight the government on your behalf, so you get the compensation you deserve. Contact our office today to learn more about eminent domain in South Carolina and how our firm can help.
AIKEN — Everyone on Aiken County Council was in agreement.There was no hesitation as the panel’s members raised their hands.They voted unanimously March 17 to approve a resolution to oppose a bill recently introduced in the S.C. House of Representatives that seeks to wrest control of the Horse Creek wastewater treatment plant from Aiken County government.The legislation, if it becomes law, would create a new nine-member commission, the Horse Creek Regional Public Service Authority, to oversee operations at th...
AIKEN — Everyone on Aiken County Council was in agreement.
There was no hesitation as the panel’s members raised their hands.
They voted unanimously March 17 to approve a resolution to oppose a bill recently introduced in the S.C. House of Representatives that seeks to wrest control of the Horse Creek wastewater treatment plant from Aiken County government.
The legislation, if it becomes law, would create a new nine-member commission, the Horse Creek Regional Public Service Authority, to oversee operations at the facility.
County Council’s action took place during the panel’s meeting at the Aiken County Government Center.
It followed a presentation by County Attorney Brad Farrar.
County Council Chairman Gary Bunker described House Bill 5321 as a “fatally flawed piece of legislation.”
All six House of Representatives members in Aiken County’s legislative delegation are sponsoring the bill along with Cal Forrest of Lexington and Saluda counties.
Farrar’s conclusions in his presentation were as follows:
• Act 542 of 1973, upon which H.B. 5321 is premised, was judicially declared unconstitutional in 1976.
• Even if Act 542 “were to be valid,” Sections 1A and 3 thereof don’t prohibit Aiken County from providing wastewater services within the county, “or continuing the services it now provides in that area.”
• Counties in South Carolina are “expressly authorized to provide wastewater treatment services” by the state’s constitution.
• Counties in South Carolina also are “expressly authorized to provide wastewater treatment services pursuant to” a section of the state’s Code of Laws.
H.B. 5321 “greatly invades county home rule and it also impacts the lives of a lot of people, the good folks who work for the county,” Farrar told County Council.
He said the resolution approved by the panel authorizes him to “submit a number of Freedom of Information Act requests to various entities,” including S.C. Gov. Henry McMaster and S.C. Secretary of State Mark Hammond.
In addition, Farrar continued, the resolution “is directing me to bring whatever action is necessary, whether it’s a declaratory judgment action or injunction or whatever, to try to prevent the takeover” of the Aiken County Public Service Authority, which is a department of Aiken County Government.
The resolution also “authorizes me to share with every other county and the South Carolina Association of Counties this particular issue,” Farrar said.
There was applause in Council Chambers after he spoke.
“It does look like we’ve got a slam dunk case,” said County Council member Mike Kellems.
He represents District 2, which includes New Ellenton.
County Council Vice Chairman Andrew Siders criticized the sponsors of H.B. 5321 for how they decided to handle what they perceived to be a problem.
“This is a situation where we identified issues with our PSA (Public Service Authority),” he said. "We’re addressing those issues with our PSA and moving forward in a pretty swift manner. And this really came out of left field.
“We found [out] that they were filing this, and they did not communicate with us at all,” Siders continued. “No one called us. No one told us about this … we didn’t know what was happening.”
Aiken County’s response will be “to fight,” Siders said.
The House Committee on Agriculture, National Resources and Environmental Affairs is scheduled to hold a hearing on H.B. 5321 in Columbia on March 24.
One of the bill’s sponsors, S.C. Rep. Bill Hixon, R-North Augusta, told the Aiken Standard that Aiken County had mismanaged the Horse Creek wastewater treatment plant.
“It’s been run wrong for a good many years, and they have not planned for the future,” he said.
The plant also is known as the Horse Creek Pollution Control Facility.
It has Beech Island address: 70 PSA Road.
With severe weather on the way, some schools are making changes to their schedules. We'll keep track of those changes here.COLUMBIA, S.C. — A severe storm is expected to bring heavy wind, rain and possible tornadoes to the South Carolina Midlands on Monday morning.As a result, some school districts are shifting their class schedules or moving to eLearning due to the storm's potential impact on their communities.Here's what we're hearing from each county.Aiken CountyAiken County schools will observe ...
With severe weather on the way, some schools are making changes to their schedules. We'll keep track of those changes here.
COLUMBIA, S.C. — A severe storm is expected to bring heavy wind, rain and possible tornadoes to the South Carolina Midlands on Monday morning.
As a result, some school districts are shifting their class schedules or moving to eLearning due to the storm's potential impact on their communities.
Here's what we're hearing from each county.
Aiken County schools will observe an eLearning Day on Monday due to forecasted severe weather, with employees working remotely and students having until March 27 to complete their assignments.
Calhoun County Public Schools will have an eLearning Day on Monday due to forecast severe weather.
Clarendon County Schools has announced that Monday will be an eLearning day due to expected severe weather. All schools and district offices will be closed. All activities are canceled. Assignments will be posted on Google Classroom. Students who face barriers to completing the assignments will be allowed additional time.
Fairfield County School District will be closed on Monday due to forecast severe weather, with no eLearning. The missed instructional day will be made up on Monday, May 25.
Kershaw County School District is shifting to an eLearning Day on Monday due to forecast severe weather, with all school buildings, offices, and afterschool activities closed or canceled. Middle and high school students will receive assignments in Canvas by 11 a.m., while elementary students will receive theirs on Tuesday. All students will have five school days to complete their work.
Lee County School District has designated Monday as an eLearning Day due to forecast severe thunderstorms with high winds and heavy rainfall, and all staff members are expected to remain available during normal work hours.
Lexington County School District One is switching to eLearning on Monday, with campuses closed and all afterschool activities canceled due to a forecast of severe weather, including damaging winds and possible tornadoes. Employees are asked to work from home, and students will have five days to complete their eLearning assignments.
Lexington Two will close all schools and offices on Monday due to forecast severe weather, with all afterschool and evening activities also canceled. The district will communicate updates by Monday afternoon regarding the status of school on Tuesday, March 17.
Lexington County School District Three is switching to an eLearning Day on Monday due to forecasted severe weather. Students will have no work on Monday but will receive make-up eLearning assignments on Tuesday, with all work due by April 2. All afterschool events are canceled.
Lexington Four schools are not scheduled to be in session on Monday.
While schools and offices in School District Five of Lexington & Richland Counties are already closed on Monday for a previously scheduled holiday, employees who were scheduled to work will transition to remote work due to forecast severe weather.
The School District of Newberry County will close all schools and offices on Monday due to forecast severe weather.
Orangeburg County School District will observe an eLearning Day on Monday due to forecast severe wind conditions, with all afterschool programs, extracurricular activities, and athletic events canceled. Students should follow the eLearning procedures previously communicated by their schools.
Richland One has announced that all schools and offices will be closed on Monday due to the severe weather forecast. School officials said this will not be an eLearning day. All afterschool activities on Monday have also been canceled. The Richland One Rising Stars Awards Ceremony is also canceled.
Richland Two will cancel classes on Monday due to forecasted severe weather and high winds. All district buildings and offices will be closed.
Saluda County schools are monitoring the weather forecast but have not made any changes to school schedules at this time.
Sumter School District has designated Monday as an eLearning Day due to forecast severe weather, with all schools, offices, and activities closed or canceled, and the day will not need to be made up. Lessons will be posted on Schoology, and students who are unable to participate due to power outages or limited internet access will be allowed to complete assignments at a later time.
COLUMBIA — Wastewater capacity in this region, from Aiken County to Edgefield and Saluda counties, has now become a state issue.All six House of Representatives members in Aiken County’s legislative delegation have sponsored a bill that would, if it’s eventually signed into law, wrest control of the regional Horse Creek wastewater treatment plant away from Aiken County government and instead bring it under the purview of a new nine-member commission.“It’s been run wrong for a good many years, and t...
COLUMBIA — Wastewater capacity in this region, from Aiken County to Edgefield and Saluda counties, has now become a state issue.
All six House of Representatives members in Aiken County’s legislative delegation have sponsored a bill that would, if it’s eventually signed into law, wrest control of the regional Horse Creek wastewater treatment plant away from Aiken County government and instead bring it under the purview of a new nine-member commission.
“It’s been run wrong for a good many years, and they have not planned for the future,” Rep. Bill Hixon, R-North Augusta, said of Aiken County’s handling of the Horse Creek facility.
Hixon is one of the sponsors of H.B. 5321, introduced March 4 and now residing in his own House Committee on Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs.
Aiken County representatives Bill Taylor, Bill Clyburn, Charlie Hartz and Melissa Oremus, along with Cal Forrest of Lexington and Saluda counties, are also sponsors on the bill.
Horse Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant is run by Aiken County Public Service Authority, and the PSA counts nearly a dozen major customers, including the cities of North Augusta and Aiken. In turn, North Augusta also has previously sold sewer capacity to Edgefield County, which itself has sold to Saluda County.
And though the facility is currently operating at just 60% or, in the next three years when its expansion comes online, just 46 percent, there’s still the very large matter of reserved, or committed, capacity — that's for new development projects that have been approved even if they haven’t manifested on the ground in actual construction.
Account for that, and there isn’t much left to dole out for new development beyond this. It’s an issue that led to Aiken County losing out on what was to have been a $185 million investment by House of Raeford for a chicken processing plant in large part because the city of Aiken couldn’t promise the company the sewer service it needed.
It’s an issue that meant Edgefield County has had to deny a new senior living facility. It’s one, too, that could have caused trouble for Fox Creek Middle School — until Edgefield County’s biggest user, the federal prison, was taken off Horse Creek and its usage diverted to the city of Edgefield.
According to Hixon, this maneuver freed up about 270,000 gallons per day for Edgefield County to then support Fox Creek.
The legislation now introduced is the result of what Hixon said is years of mismanagement of the Horse Creek treatment plant by Aiken County Public Service Authority.
The bill would dissolve that Authority and create in its place the Horse Creek Regional Public Service Authority with representation from the three counties the treatment plant services. Five of its board members would come from Aiken County, three from Edgefield County and one from Saluda County, the split determined by each county’s relative usage of the plant.
These members would be appointed by the governor based on recommendations by a majority of the state legislators who represent them. The bill stipulates that no more than five of the nine members be elected officials.
And if the bill becomes law, the proposed date for control of Horse Creek to transfer over to the new Authority is Sept. 30 of this year.
Aiken County Council Chairman Gary Bunker said he and others with Aiken County are opposed to this legislation.
Bunker said it also came as a surprise that such a bill would be introduced now when the county over the past two years has approved procurement after procurement for improving the treatment plant, including what’s now a $70 million expansion of it that will increase its total capacity by 30% to 26 million gallons per day.
Bunker credits Aiken County’s Brian Sanders, who took over as county administrator in summer of 2023, with pushing for upgrades at Horse Creek, Bunker also offering the candid statement that the facility had been “run into the ground.”
No spares on its parts, and continual issues with the most recent major overhaul, a $50 million state investment into the carousels that serve as an integral component to treating wastewater.
And the reality just a couple years back that the plant was “one pump away” from presenting major operational problems.
Bunker wasn’t able to give a clear picture for how the facility was run prior to Sanders taking the lead on it.
What is known is that operational rates — what citizens are seeing reflected in their own water bills — had remained flat for at least 12 years, from 2012 until mid-2025 when the first of two rate hikes came through.
Nor had the charge for the treatment plant’s customers — city of Aiken, city of North Augusta et al. — been changed over the years, something that meant sticker shock: what had been 49 cents a gallon will now cost $10.89 a gallon.
Though a 2,250% increase, that new rate merely pulls Aiken County PSA up from cheapest of the bunch in the state South Carolina to middle of the pack, according to data given by the county’s consultant on the plant expansion.
But it’s that combination of a sudden increase in cost with the situation of not having unallocated, uncommitted sewer capacity to promise new development the service it needs.
It’s meant that in North Augusta, the city is now having to prioritize commercial development, wielding what sewer capacity it has left as an incentive for economic investments.
For the city of Aiken, it’s led to a requirement, finalized March 9, that new development pay for the added capacity that the city council has authorized it purchase from the Horse Creek expansion, some 1.5 million gallons at a price of $16.3 million.
Aiken County’s Bunker said these decisions are all choices made at the retailer level: Bunker likened Aiken County’s position to that of a wholesaler and its customers to that of retailers, selling the wastewater capacity they’ve purchased to developers or, in North Augusta’s case, to Edgefield County for it to then sell to developers.
These “retailers,” Bunker said, approved new development over the years based on capacity they had purchased and that was still available, and the rate of those approvals has now dwindled what they have left to give.
Hixon, though, said it’s a consequence of what he said is historically poor management of the plant.
“There’s growth in this region. We need more capacity, and there isn’t capacity,” he said. “We could get the finest industry to want to come here, to Aiken or Edgefield or Saluda, and we’d have to tell them goodbye.”
Hixon said he sees this new legislation as offering a benefit to Aiken County: it takes the treatment facility off the county’s hands, he said.
Bunker said he sees it differently. It takes local control from a local operation in having its board appointed by the governor based on input by state representatives, he said.
Hixon’s committee is scheduled to have a hearing on the bill March 24, during which representatives of Aiken, Edgefield and Saluda counties, as well as the cities of Aiken and North Augusta, have been invited to testify.