Most people who buy a home and the land it sits on expect that it will be theirs for as long as they choose to reside there. They may choose to pass that home and land along to children or other family members once they pass. It's a very common scenario, but for some residents of Charleston County, it may not be possible due to a highway expansion. Once the expansion starts, these residents could actually lose their land. And while you wouldn't think such an action would be legal in America, truth is often stranger than fiction.
The newly proposed expansion on Highway 41 will expand the highway to two lanes, increasing it to a total of four lanes on most of the roadway and from two to three lanes near the Phillips Community. The project would also start construction of Laurel Hill Parkway - a two-lane road that intersects through the outskirts of Laurel Hill County Park. For the Phillips Community, which sits adjacent to the highway, it could mean the loss of residents' homes and land that have been in their families for generations.
So, what can people like those in the Phillips Community do? They don't want to lose their homes or bear the burden of significantly more traffic around them. On their own, the options can be dour. But with the help of eminent domain attorneys Near Me Anderson, SC, these families can receive the just compensation they deserve.
Remember that when you purchase or are given a plot of land, your property rights aren't as absolute as you may think. According to the United States Constitution, the government has the authority to take your property under specific circumstances. Essentially, your property rights are not absolute.
What's interesting is that the government's ability to take your property is actually stated in the Constitution. Even though the Constitution states that "private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation," in essence, this means the government can take your property if the intended use is valid and they compensate you fairly. The Supreme Court upheld this view in 1876, interpreting that the government had this power based on the Constitution. Eminent domain was frequently used during the construction of the nation's railroad system, often without sufficient limitations on the government.
Unfortunately, many South Carolina residents end up being on the wrong end of the cost-benefit analysis when it comes to fair compensation. That's why, if the government is trying to take your land, it's so important to get in touch with eminent domain attorneys Near Me Anderson, SC, as soon as possible. That way, you have someone by your side for any legal proceedings or disputes. At Lauren Taylor Law, we have a proven track record of achieving positive outcomes for our clients in cases where the government has failed to fulfill its legal responsibilities.
There are typically two different ways that the government may take your property. Those include:
In both scenarios, you could be forced into litigation in order to protect your rights, even though you had no plans on doing so.
When the government wants to acquire your land, they will typically begin by making a formal offer to buy your property. At this point, you may have the opportunity to negotiate with them. If you decide that selling your property is the best option, it's important to work towards reaching an agreement with the government on the sale price. This isn't always a straightforward process because the government may not be willing to offer you a fair amount.
To determine the price of your property, the government will have their appraiser assess the value of the property. This appraiser functions much like an adjuster for an insurance company, many of whom offer lowball pricing. You should know that you have the right to hire your own appraiser to determine an independent valuation. This is often the best course of action if you're considering selling to the government.
If you choose not to sell to the government, they may proceed by filing a lawsuit to initiate the condemnation process. At this point, you can challenge the taking itself by working with eminent domain attorneys Near Me Anderson, SC. You can also ask the court to determine the fair market value of the property if the government's valuation is lower than what you believe is fair.
Given the history of these cases, you can never trust the government to act fairly. Why? Because local officials often have interests in such matters, and your rights are getting in their way. Sometimes, the only viable route you have is to lawyer up and fight the case in court.
When the government wants to acquire your land, they will typically begin by making a formal offer to buy your property. At this point, you may have the opportunity to negotiate with them. If you decide that selling your property is the best option, it's important to work towards reaching an agreement with the government on the sale price. This isn't always a straightforward process because the government may not be willing to offer you a fair amount.
To determine the price of your property, the government will have their appraiser assess the value of the property. This appraiser functions much like an adjuster for an insurance company, many of whom offer lowball pricing. You should know that you have the right to hire your own appraiser to determine an independent valuation. This is often the best course of action if you're considering selling to the government.
If you choose not to sell to the government, they may proceed by filing a lawsuit to initiate the condemnation process. At this point, you can challenge the taking itself by working with eminent domain attorneys Near Me Anderson, SC. You can also ask the court to determine the fair market value of the property if the government's valuation is lower than what you believe is fair.
While the government can use its power to take your land, there are limits on its ability to do so. Namely:
As such, there are two reasons why you can sue the government as part of an eminent domain case:
Given the history of these cases, you can never trust the government to act fairly. Why? Because local officials often have interests in such matters, and your rights are getting in their way. Sometimes, the only viable route you have is to lawyer up and fight the case in court.
Landowners commonly contest whether the taking is genuinely for public use. There are constraints on the government's actions and the reasons for which they can seize your land. The interpretation of these terms by the courts often favors the government. "Public use" does not simply mean that your property would be open to the general public. Instead, the term is more akin to "for the benefit of the public."
Historically, the government expropriated private lands for projects such as bridges and highways. Numerous legal battles arose during the period when the nation was constructing its railroad system. In these instances, the courts typically interpreted "public use" more broadly.
Some of the most common reasons why government landtaking is upheld include the building of structures like:
These are the more "traditional" uses of eminent domain, where the public use would be less in question. However, the law also permits certain utilities to wield the power of eminent domain. For instance, in a recent case in South Carolina, Dominion Energy was granted the authority to acquire homes in order to construct an energy pipeline.
Regrettably, governments have historically tended to misuse this authority, and some courts have even condoned such actions. As an example, courts in Toledo, Ohio, allowed 83 homes to be taken from residents in order to construct a manufacturing plant for Chrysler, which said the plant would create jobs for the public.
If the government is trying to take your land, you should never give up on your property. By working with eminent domain attorneys Near Me Anderson, SC, you may be able to stop them by challenging the taking itself. You can also challenge the purpose of the taking and argue that the reason for "public use" is really for private use.
Many people worry about the government taking over their entire piece of land. However, in some cases, the government may not need all your property and might not want to compensate you for it. They may only require a portion of your land.
In such instances, the government not only has to pay you for the part of the land they are taking, but they also have to compensate for the decreased value of the remaining land that you still own. Additionally, the government may seek to obtain an easement on your land through eminent domain. This easement could be for utilities or access to another area. Once again, the government must compensate you for the land taken and for the reduction in value of the rest of your property.
In essence, fair market value represents the amount a willing buyer would offer to a seller for their property. While this concept seems straightforward, applying fair market value in reality can be quite challenging. In many instances, negotiating with the government may be necessary to receive proper compensation for your land. Just like any negotiator, the government typically begins with a low offer and anticipates a counteroffer from you to reach a mutual agreement. Rarely does the government present its best offer right from the start.
Several valuations may be considered to determine your property's fair market value:
The amount of income your property could have produced
Comparison of sales to other similar properties in the area that were recently sold (there could be disagreements pertaining to what is comparable)
The amount of money it would cost to replace your property (and the structures built on it) minus depreciation
In reality, during a trial, both you and the government would have valuation experts testify. First, you'd have to choose the relevant valuation, which the government might dispute. Then, you'd need to apply the appropriate valuation method. There might be a significant difference between your numbers and the government's.
However, even if you couldn't prevent the seizure of the property, many have successfully challenged the government's valuation of their property. Property owners have compelled the government to pay more, and our team of eminent domain attorneys Near Me Anderson, SC, has represented many of them in the legal process over the years.
For Any Help, Questions or Suggestions, Contact Us
Typically, you'll receive notice regarding the potential acquisition of your property through a letter. But if you're like the residents of the Phillips Community, you might have already heard murmurs that something might happen to your land. If you suspect or find out that the government plans to take your land through eminent domain, you need the help of seasoned eminent domain attorneys Near Me Anderson, SC, right away.
The truth is that the government can be just as challenging to deal with as an insurance company. Despite your constitutional rights, they might try to conceal information or offer far less compensation than your property is worth.
In an eminent domain lawsuit, you're essentially challenging the government. While some courts might show some level of deference to the government, they are not given free rein to do as they please. It's within your rights to stand up and contest the government's actions if they violate your rights. But to fight back effectively, your best bet is to work with an eminent domain lawyer from Lauren Taylor Law.
Your attorney will assess the best legal approach for your case, which could involve suing the government or vigorously defending against their lawsuit. You could also negotiate compensation, either before or after the case goes to court.
If you receive notice that your property is being targeted for eminent domain action, also known as condemnation, it's important to seek advice from an eminent domain attorney. Many people won't reach out to a lawyer when dealing with this kind of legal issue because they:
Unfortunately, these assumptions are rarely, if ever, true. In fact, you may actually be more vulnerable and at risk than you originally thought. This misunderstanding illustrates exactly why you should enlist the services of a reputable eminent domain attorney. With the assistance of a legal expert who is well-versed in South Carolina eminent domain law, property owners can safeguard their rights and secure maximum compensation.
Here are the top three ways an eminent domain lawyer can help:
It's important to keep in mind that the initial offer from the government for your property is often the lowest amount they think they can get away with. This rarely represents the full and fair compensation you deserve. An attorney has the expertise and resources to ensure that you receive proper compensation for the value of your property, including relocation expenses and more.
In some instances, an eminent domain attorney may be able to secure a higher amount than what the government is proposing. The eminent domain lawyers at Lauren Taylor Law are dedicated to safeguarding your rights and protecting your property
Government agencies are not permitted to simply take any property they desire. According to the 5th Amendment, they must prove that the condemnation is genuinely for public use and meets other specific criteria. You have the right to demand that the state fulfill these criteria before seizing your property. Plus, if only a portion of your property is necessary to complete the project, you have the right to safeguard the ownership of the remaining part of your property.
Eminent domain cases and their related laws can be quite intricate and overwhelming for the average property owner. You shouldn't be expected to grasp all the technical terms, and you certainly shouldn't be penalized for not fully understanding the process. That's why having an experienced eminent domain lawyer by your side is valuable on many levels. A skilled eminent domain attorney will assist you through each stage in plain language that you can grasp. With an eminent domain attorney advocating for you throughout your case to safeguard your rights, you stand a better chance of receiving the compensation you rightfully deserve.
If the government takes your property or prevents you from using it, you have the right to file a lawsuit. The law provides you with the opportunity to stand on equal ground with our government, allowing your lawyer to advocate for your rights in court.
At Lauren Taylor Law, our eminent domain lawyers step in so you don't get pushed around. Our goal is to fight the government on your behalf, so you get the compensation you deserve. Contact our office today to learn more about eminent domain in South Carolina and how our firm can help.
Four Anderson County food establishments fell below the "78" score threshold for a "C" rating in September 2026 restaurant inspection reports, according to the South Carolina Department of Agriculture (SCDA).The statewide inspection team did not identify any "C" level violations at grocery stores or food institutions during last month's inspection and did not issue a below-average inspection until Sept. 31.Inspectors conducted a follow-up during January and two routine inspections....
Four Anderson County food establishments fell below the "78" score threshold for a "C" rating in September 2026 restaurant inspection reports, according to the South Carolina Department of Agriculture (SCDA).
The statewide inspection team did not identify any "C" level violations at grocery stores or food institutions during last month's inspection and did not issue a below-average inspection until Sept. 31.
Inspectors conducted a follow-up during January and two routine inspections.
In our coverage of food inspections around Anderson County, we will categorize violations into two types: priority and foundational. Priority violations are those that pose the highest risk of causing foodborne illness and identify contributing factors that could lead to illness. A priority foundational violation is a contributing factor to illness.
Three major Greenville developments gain momentum with new milestonesHere is a snapshot of the establishment found in the September food grade inspection that fell below a "78" grade, along with the follow-up inspection report:
Location: 108 E. Main St., Pendleton, S.C.
During an initial routine inspection in September, SCDA identified 21 out-of-compliance violations, including five foundation violations, 10 core violations, and six priority violations. Some of the most notable violations were:
Inspection score: 73 out of 100
Location: 301 N. McDuffie Street, Anderson, S.C.
During an initial routine inspection in September, SCDA identified 21 out-of-compliance violations, including three foundation violations, 11 core violations, and seven priority violations. Some of the most notable violations were:
Inspection score: 64 out of 100
Location: 2102 N. Main St., Anderson, S.C.
During an initial routine inspection in August, SCDA identified 18 out-of-compliance violations, including six foundation, six core, and six priority violations. Some of the most notable violations were:
Inspection score: 71 out of 100
Location: 604 E. Front St., Iva, S.C.
During an initial routine inspection in August, SCDA identified 16 out-of-compliance violations, including five foundation violations, five core violations, and six priority violations. Some of the most notable violations were:
Inspection Score: 72 out of 100
Reporter Terry Benjamin can be reached at TBenjamin@USATodayCo.com
Top 2027 recruit has committed to the . The 6-5 post player from Anderson (SC) chose Iowa over Georgia."I love talking to all of them," Hartwell previously told Rivals. "They're great. Coach Jan [Jensen], all of them. They're just great and I love talking to them. They get to know me very well."There were several factors Hartwell was considering."For me, it's really connections," Hartwell said of factors she's considering. "I think it is going to be a feeling. When I g...
Top 2027 recruit has committed to the . The 6-5 post player from Anderson (SC) chose Iowa over Georgia.
"I love talking to all of them," Hartwell previously told Rivals. "They're great. Coach Jan [Jensen], all of them. They're just great and I love talking to them. They get to know me very well."
There were several factors Hartwell was considering.
"For me, it's really connections," Hartwell said of factors she's considering. "I think it is going to be a feeling. When I go up there and I'm in the jersey and everything, I think there's going to be a feeling of 'I really love it here.'"
Iowa is getting a big with great size in Hartwell.
"I always say I need to work on everything," Hartwell said of what she's working on in her game. "I've got to get stronger. I've got to work on my timing. I've got to work on some new moves for the bag. I'm mainly working on new moves and playing stronger, along with speed and agility."
Hartwell previously talked to On3's Kyle Huesmann about the Hawkeyes: "Iowa's been recruiting me for the past year. I've talked to pretty much all of the coaches [at Iowa]. I've talked to Coach Jan and Coach Barrett, all of them, and I'm building a great relationship with them. That's why I decided to go on an official visit. I've been watching them all the time, and I feel like in Iowa, they just love women's basketball. I feel like that's a great thing because I want to be surrounded by a great culture, with people supporting you always. I know they work well with bigs, so if I go there, I know they'll make sure that I go as far as I can go."
The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division has been notified of a cybersecurity issue with Frontline Education, a software used by multiple school districts in the UpstateANDERSON, S.C. —Several school districts in the Upstate are reporting a cybersecurity incident that may have compromised student and staff information.The data breach involves two branches of a software called Frontline Education: Application Tracking, which stores Social Security numbers, addresses and other essential e...
The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division has been notified of a cybersecurity issue with Frontline Education, a software used by multiple school districts in the Upstate
ANDERSON, S.C. —
Several school districts in the Upstate are reporting a cybersecurity incident that may have compromised student and staff information.
The data breach involves two branches of a software called Frontline Education: Application Tracking, which stores Social Security numbers, addresses and other essential employee information, and Health Services, which stores student medical records and billing.
The scope and motive behind the incident are uncertain.
The South Carolina Department of Education confirmed the breach happened on Aug. 14, 2026, but the public was informed in early October:
"Protecting sensitive information is a top priority for South Carolina's public schools and the Department. We are closely monitoring reports regarding a cybersecurity incident involving Frontline Education and are committed to sharing accurate information as it becomes available.
"Frontline Education is communicating directly with affected school districts regarding a cybersecurity incident involving its systems.
"At this time, the South Carolina Department of Education has not received direct notification from Frontline regarding the scope of the incident, including the number or identity of South Carolina school districts that may have been affected.
"According to information publicly reported and shared with affected organizations, Frontline began issuing breach notifications to affected school districts and employees on October 1, 2026. The company reported that while the incident was first publicly disclosed in October, the underlying intrusion was detected on August 14, 2026.
"Based on information released to date, the incident stemmed from a vulnerability in a third-party software product used within Frontline's environment. Frontline has indicated that certain employee information may have been accessed, including Social Security numbers, email addresses, and home addresses. Law enforcement has been notified, and Frontline is offering affected individuals two years of complimentary credit monitoring and identity theft protection services.
"Districts that have received notifications from Frontline are best positioned to address questions regarding their individual circumstances and response efforts."
The software is used by multiple school districts. As of Tuesday afternoon, WYFF News 4 can confirm Anderson School Districts 2, 3 and 5 were impacted.
As of Tuesday afternoon, each district within Anderson, Greenville and Spartanburg County has been contacted by WYFF News 4 to confirm or deny being impacted. Some, like Greenville County Schools, are monitoring the issue but have not been informed that their software was involved in the breach.
Anderson School District 3's Dylan McCollough showed us an email received from a third-party called Cyberscout confirming the breach. Because it was from an outside source and not directly through Frontline, the district was hesitant to believe it in case it was a phishing scheme.
"We don't have any control over it, unfortunately. Our team in the district works very hard to keep our information safe. We are working to ensure that it doesn't happen again, if we can help that," McCollough said.
Parents were notified starting on Oct. 1. Tiffany Do, a mother of three school children with special needs, remembers getting the alert on her phone and growing concerned her student's information was in the wrong hands.
"I understand they (the district) don't have a lot of information to give us... but as parents it's very critical. It's really nerve-wracking, to be honest," Do said.
Anderson School District 5 shared this message with families:
"Dear Anderson Five Parents and Guardians:
"Anderson School District Five has received notification from a vendor representing Frontline Education, a provider of several systems used by the district, that Frontline experienced a cybersecurity incident compromising student information. Frontline provides several systems used by Anderson School District Five. We do not yet know the full scope of the incident, the types of information involved, or which individual students were affected.
"Our Information Technology & Security Services team has reported the notification to SLED in accordance with district procedures and continues to seek additional details directly from Frontline.
"Frontline will contact affected students’ families directly with information about their available options and next steps. We do not yet have further details about those options or the timing of the notifications.
"We understand that this news is concerning, particularly while questions remain unanswered. We take our responsibility to protect student information seriously and are working to obtain clear answers for our families. We will share additional confirmed information as it becomes available.
"Thank you for your patience as we work through this situation."
Then on Tuesday afternoon, a parent provided an updated message from the district:
"Dear Anderson Five Families:
"We understand that the cybersecurity incident shared with you Friday may have raised concerns and left questions about your student’s information. We know how important clear answers are, and while we are still awaiting many specifics, we want to share what we know at this time.
"Frontline provides several systems used by Anderson Five. The incident involved, in part, its School Health module, which supports nursing services. According to Frontline, which has published a general notice on its website, the information compromised varies by school district and individual.
"Anderson Five has requested a comprehensive list identifying the students affected and the specific information compromised for each student, but we have not yet received it. Frontline will contact affected families directly with details and available next steps.
"Frontline states that its platforms are operational and secured. We recognize that this assurance does not answer every question or establish the full impact on Anderson Five. Please know that we are taking this situation seriously and continue to seek clear, specific answers for our families. In the meantime, we remain committed to transparency and sharing verified information as we receive it.
"Again, we appreciate your patience as we work through this situation."
WYFF News 4 has reached out to Frontline Education and the Cyberscout team for comment.
The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division has been notified and is assisting with the incident through its South Carolina Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity (SC CIC) team.