Most people who buy a home and the land it sits on expect that it will be theirs for as long as they choose to reside there. They may choose to pass that home and land along to children or other family members once they pass. It's a very common scenario, but for some residents of Charleston County, it may not be possible due to a highway expansion. Once the expansion starts, these residents could actually lose their land. And while you wouldn't think such an action would be legal in America, truth is often stranger than fiction.
The newly proposed expansion on Highway 41 will expand the highway to two lanes, increasing it to a total of four lanes on most of the roadway and from two to three lanes near the Phillips Community. The project would also start construction of Laurel Hill Parkway - a two-lane road that intersects through the outskirts of Laurel Hill County Park. For the Phillips Community, which sits adjacent to the highway, it could mean the loss of residents' homes and land that have been in their families for generations.
So, what can people like those in the Phillips Community do? They don't want to lose their homes or bear the burden of significantly more traffic around them. On their own, the options can be dour. But with the help of eminent domain attorneys in Rock Hill, SC, these families can receive the just compensation they deserve.
Remember that when you purchase or are given a plot of land, your property rights aren't as absolute as you may think. According to the United States Constitution, the government has the authority to take your property under specific circumstances. Essentially, your property rights are not absolute.
What's interesting is that the government's ability to take your property is actually stated in the Constitution. Even though the Constitution states that "private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation," in essence, this means the government can take your property if the intended use is valid and they compensate you fairly. The Supreme Court upheld this view in 1876, interpreting that the government had this power based on the Constitution. Eminent domain was frequently used during the construction of the nation's railroad system, often without sufficient limitations on the government.
Unfortunately, many South Carolina residents end up being on the wrong end of the cost-benefit analysis when it comes to fair compensation. That's why, if the government is trying to take your land, it's so important to get in touch with eminent domain attorneys in Rock Hill, SC, as soon as possible. That way, you have someone by your side for any legal proceedings or disputes. At Lauren Taylor Law, we have a proven track record of achieving positive outcomes for our clients in cases where the government has failed to fulfill its legal responsibilities.
There are typically two different ways that the government may take your property. Those include:
In both scenarios, you could be forced into litigation in order to protect your rights, even though you had no plans on doing so.
When the government wants to acquire your land, they will typically begin by making a formal offer to buy your property. At this point, you may have the opportunity to negotiate with them. If you decide that selling your property is the best option, it's important to work towards reaching an agreement with the government on the sale price. This isn't always a straightforward process because the government may not be willing to offer you a fair amount.
To determine the price of your property, the government will have their appraiser assess the value of the property. This appraiser functions much like an adjuster for an insurance company, many of whom offer lowball pricing. You should know that you have the right to hire your own appraiser to determine an independent valuation. This is often the best course of action if you're considering selling to the government.
If you choose not to sell to the government, they may proceed by filing a lawsuit to initiate the condemnation process. At this point, you can challenge the taking itself by working with eminent domain attorneys in Rock Hill, SC. You can also ask the court to determine the fair market value of the property if the government's valuation is lower than what you believe is fair.
Given the history of these cases, you can never trust the government to act fairly. Why? Because local officials often have interests in such matters, and your rights are getting in their way. Sometimes, the only viable route you have is to lawyer up and fight the case in court.
When the government wants to acquire your land, they will typically begin by making a formal offer to buy your property. At this point, you may have the opportunity to negotiate with them. If you decide that selling your property is the best option, it's important to work towards reaching an agreement with the government on the sale price. This isn't always a straightforward process because the government may not be willing to offer you a fair amount.
To determine the price of your property, the government will have their appraiser assess the value of the property. This appraiser functions much like an adjuster for an insurance company, many of whom offer lowball pricing. You should know that you have the right to hire your own appraiser to determine an independent valuation. This is often the best course of action if you're considering selling to the government.
If you choose not to sell to the government, they may proceed by filing a lawsuit to initiate the condemnation process. At this point, you can challenge the taking itself by working with eminent domain attorneys in Rock Hill, SC. You can also ask the court to determine the fair market value of the property if the government's valuation is lower than what you believe is fair.
While the government can use its power to take your land, there are limits on its ability to do so. Namely:
As such, there are two reasons why you can sue the government as part of an eminent domain case:
Given the history of these cases, you can never trust the government to act fairly. Why? Because local officials often have interests in such matters, and your rights are getting in their way. Sometimes, the only viable route you have is to lawyer up and fight the case in court.
Landowners commonly contest whether the taking is genuinely for public use. There are constraints on the government's actions and the reasons for which they can seize your land. The interpretation of these terms by the courts often favors the government. "Public use" does not simply mean that your property would be open to the general public. Instead, the term is more akin to "for the benefit of the public."
Historically, the government expropriated private lands for projects such as bridges and highways. Numerous legal battles arose during the period when the nation was constructing its railroad system. In these instances, the courts typically interpreted "public use" more broadly.
Some of the most common reasons why government landtaking is upheld include the building of structures like:
These are the more "traditional" uses of eminent domain, where the public use would be less in question. However, the law also permits certain utilities to wield the power of eminent domain. For instance, in a recent case in South Carolina, Dominion Energy was granted the authority to acquire homes in order to construct an energy pipeline.
Regrettably, governments have historically tended to misuse this authority, and some courts have even condoned such actions. As an example, courts in Toledo, Ohio, allowed 83 homes to be taken from residents in order to construct a manufacturing plant for Chrysler, which said the plant would create jobs for the public.
If the government is trying to take your land, you should never give up on your property. By working with eminent domain attorneys in Rock Hill, SC, you may be able to stop them by challenging the taking itself. You can also challenge the purpose of the taking and argue that the reason for "public use" is really for private use.
Many people worry about the government taking over their entire piece of land. However, in some cases, the government may not need all your property and might not want to compensate you for it. They may only require a portion of your land.
In such instances, the government not only has to pay you for the part of the land they are taking, but they also have to compensate for the decreased value of the remaining land that you still own. Additionally, the government may seek to obtain an easement on your land through eminent domain. This easement could be for utilities or access to another area. Once again, the government must compensate you for the land taken and for the reduction in value of the rest of your property.
In essence, fair market value represents the amount a willing buyer would offer to a seller for their property. While this concept seems straightforward, applying fair market value in reality can be quite challenging. In many instances, negotiating with the government may be necessary to receive proper compensation for your land. Just like any negotiator, the government typically begins with a low offer and anticipates a counteroffer from you to reach a mutual agreement. Rarely does the government present its best offer right from the start.
Several valuations may be considered to determine your property's fair market value:
The amount of income your property could have produced
Comparison of sales to other similar properties in the area that were recently sold (there could be disagreements pertaining to what is comparable)
The amount of money it would cost to replace your property (and the structures built on it) minus depreciation
In reality, during a trial, both you and the government would have valuation experts testify. First, you'd have to choose the relevant valuation, which the government might dispute. Then, you'd need to apply the appropriate valuation method. There might be a significant difference between your numbers and the government's.
However, even if you couldn't prevent the seizure of the property, many have successfully challenged the government's valuation of their property. Property owners have compelled the government to pay more, and our team of eminent domain attorneys in Rock Hill, SC, has represented many of them in the legal process over the years.
For Any Help, Questions or Suggestions, Contact Us
Typically, you'll receive notice regarding the potential acquisition of your property through a letter. But if you're like the residents of the Phillips Community, you might have already heard murmurs that something might happen to your land. If you suspect or find out that the government plans to take your land through eminent domain, you need the help of seasoned eminent domain attorneys in Rock Hill, SC, right away.
The truth is that the government can be just as challenging to deal with as an insurance company. Despite your constitutional rights, they might try to conceal information or offer far less compensation than your property is worth.
In an eminent domain lawsuit, you're essentially challenging the government. While some courts might show some level of deference to the government, they are not given free rein to do as they please. It's within your rights to stand up and contest the government's actions if they violate your rights. But to fight back effectively, your best bet is to work with an eminent domain lawyer from Lauren Taylor Law.
Your attorney will assess the best legal approach for your case, which could involve suing the government or vigorously defending against their lawsuit. You could also negotiate compensation, either before or after the case goes to court.
If you receive notice that your property is being targeted for eminent domain action, also known as condemnation, it's important to seek advice from an eminent domain attorney. Many people won't reach out to a lawyer when dealing with this kind of legal issue because they:
Unfortunately, these assumptions are rarely, if ever, true. In fact, you may actually be more vulnerable and at risk than you originally thought. This misunderstanding illustrates exactly why you should enlist the services of a reputable eminent domain attorney. With the assistance of a legal expert who is well-versed in South Carolina eminent domain law, property owners can safeguard their rights and secure maximum compensation.
Here are the top three ways an eminent domain lawyer can help:
It's important to keep in mind that the initial offer from the government for your property is often the lowest amount they think they can get away with. This rarely represents the full and fair compensation you deserve. An attorney has the expertise and resources to ensure that you receive proper compensation for the value of your property, including relocation expenses and more.
In some instances, an eminent domain attorney may be able to secure a higher amount than what the government is proposing. The eminent domain lawyers at Lauren Taylor Law are dedicated to safeguarding your rights and protecting your property
Government agencies are not permitted to simply take any property they desire. According to the 5th Amendment, they must prove that the condemnation is genuinely for public use and meets other specific criteria. You have the right to demand that the state fulfill these criteria before seizing your property. Plus, if only a portion of your property is necessary to complete the project, you have the right to safeguard the ownership of the remaining part of your property.
Eminent domain cases and their related laws can be quite intricate and overwhelming for the average property owner. You shouldn't be expected to grasp all the technical terms, and you certainly shouldn't be penalized for not fully understanding the process. That's why having an experienced eminent domain lawyer by your side is valuable on many levels. A skilled eminent domain attorney will assist you through each stage in plain language that you can grasp. With an eminent domain attorney advocating for you throughout your case to safeguard your rights, you stand a better chance of receiving the compensation you rightfully deserve.
If the government takes your property or prevents you from using it, you have the right to file a lawsuit. The law provides you with the opportunity to stand on equal ground with our government, allowing your lawyer to advocate for your rights in court.
At Lauren Taylor Law, our eminent domain lawyers step in so you don't get pushed around. Our goal is to fight the government on your behalf, so you get the compensation you deserve. Contact our office today to learn more about eminent domain in South Carolina and how our firm can help.
Due to pressure from state laws he likens to modern-day prohibition, Bryan O’Neal just closed Lancaster County’s only brewery.Benford Brewing is now temporarily closed for on-premise beer consumption until the state changes its liquor liability insurance laws, he told The Herald on Wednesday. The sawmill, woodworking, beef sales and raw milk distribution operations on O’Neal’s Boxcar Road property will continue.Benford Brewing began as Boxcar Brewing in 2012, just north of the city of Lancaster. It&rsquo...
Due to pressure from state laws he likens to modern-day prohibition, Bryan O’Neal just closed Lancaster County’s only brewery.
Benford Brewing is now temporarily closed for on-premise beer consumption until the state changes its liquor liability insurance laws, he told The Herald on Wednesday. The sawmill, woodworking, beef sales and raw milk distribution operations on O’Neal’s Boxcar Road property will continue.
Benford Brewing began as Boxcar Brewing in 2012, just north of the city of Lancaster. It’s craft beer brands include Carolina Blackout, Southern Tater and World’s Problem Solver.
“I’m tired of the government telling me what I can and can’t do,” O’Neal said. “These politicians created this law requiring every restaurant, bar and brewery to have a million-dollar liquor liability policy. Through COVID and lawsuits, it’s just now getting caught up to us.”
South Carolina passed the liability law last year, and potentially, it could still be revised. It’s a foundation but not a finished product, according to the South Carolina Restaurant & Lodging Association.
The bill was approved 41-1 in the state Senate after passing in the state House.
Last year, Gov. Henry McMaster called the new law a common-sense liquor liability rule requiring anyone selling alcohol after 5 p.m. for on-premise consumption to have an insurance policy at $1 million or more.
Businesses could reduce that coverage requirement if they stopped selling at midnight or if alcohol was less than 40% of total sales. The coverage could be cut in half for nonprofits hosting events with a special licence.
The goal of the law, which took effect this year, was to reduce liability businesses face for DUI or damages caused by customers after they were served. Legislators hailed the law change as a business-friendly move to protect alcohol sellers.
“At no time should the actions of government put businesses out of business,” S.C. Senate President Thomas Alexander in announcing the new law last spring.
But that’s exactly what happened at Benford Brewing, O’Neal said.
His farm, which transformed into an events venue when COVID hit and has since hosted bands and food trucks, has to close by 5 p.m. Since his insurance policy expired last fall, no company will quote him coverage because 40% of his revenue doesn’t come from food sales, O’Neal said.
He’s heard of places being quoted $30,000 to $100,000 per year for coverage, he said.
The amount of craft beer O’Neal would have to sell, while closing before many people get off work, just isn’t feasible. “Why do I even have a brewery?” hel asked.
He’ll keep his equipment on site and will start back up if state laws become more favorable. He’s also spoken to other brewers and state legislators about the issue.
Meanwhile, O’Neal will continue making epoxy tables, sawing lumber and processing cattle, in hopes that those business don’t dry up over the brewery issue.
“Usually it happens over a beer,” he said of the handshake deals that keep him in business. “We’ve always said that beer sells wood. It sells beef.”
With candidate filing ongoing for state and local elections this fall, O’Neal plans to use his extra time to lobby for his business, his passion.
“I just made a decision to shut it down,” he said, “and get loud.”
The chance of tornadoes and other violent storms grew for Charlotte, Rock Hill and Hickory this weekend, with those cities having the “highest chance of severe hazards” in the Western Carolinas on Monday, National Weather Service meteorologists said.The cities are under an “enhanced risk” of “numerous severe thunderstorms” between 6 and 10 a.m., NWS forecasters said on social media.“While a few isolated storms could occur ahead of a line of thunderstorms Sunday evening, the main concern...
The chance of tornadoes and other violent storms grew for Charlotte, Rock Hill and Hickory this weekend, with those cities having the “highest chance of severe hazards” in the Western Carolinas on Monday, National Weather Service meteorologists said.
The cities are under an “enhanced risk” of “numerous severe thunderstorms” between 6 and 10 a.m., NWS forecasters said on social media.
“While a few isolated storms could occur ahead of a line of thunderstorms Sunday evening, the main concern is for Monday morning,” NWS meteorologists said.
“Confidence is higher for severe hazards like tornadoes in areas east of the mountains, especially along and east of I-77 and south of I-85,” according to the NWS office in Greer, S.C.
Damaging winds are likely, NWS forecasters said.
“Remember, straight line winds can snap trees, down power lines and cause damage to homes and cars,” the NWS said. “Know where your safe place is and avoid seeking shelter in a mobile home.”
“Our main concern is the line of thunderstorms anywhere from 6 to 10 a.m. Monday,” meteorologist Christiaan Patterson of the Greer office told The Charlotte Observer.
School buses and commuters will be on the roads, she said. It’s important for everyone to know in advance a “safe place” to go during storms and have a way of receiving weather alerts, she said.
Saturday afternoon, the S.C. State Climatology office issued a similar severe weather warning.
“We remain on track for an outbreak of severe thunderstorms on Monday, capable of causing widespread damaging wind, large hail, and tornadoes,” Frank Strait, severe weather liaison for the office said in a statement.
“It still looks like the timing will be early in the day over the Upstate, possibly even before daybreak in the far west, through midday,” Strait said. “The rest of the state will see the storms hit from midday through early evening.”
Thursday, five tornadoes ripped through parts of three Eastern North Carolina counties, injuring a person in a home, tearing roofs, slicing trees and overturning campers, the National Weather Service reported late Friday.
Charlotte has a 100% chance of showers Monday, the NWS forecast on Sunday showed. Sunny skies are forecast on Tuesday and mostly sunny skies through Saturday.
After an expected high of 72 on Sunday, Charlotte could see highs near 66 on Monday, 48 on Tuesday, 50 on Wednesday, 62 on Thursday, 70 on Friday and 75 on Saturday, according to the forecast.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
ROCK HILL, S.C. (WBTV) - Indigenous people with roots in York County will be sharing their culture with the community in Rock Hill all weekend.Winthrop University in Rock Hill will host the Catawba Nation Powwow starting Friday, March 13, through Sunday, March 15. The event will take place at the Winthrop Coliseum.A Native American Powwow is a gathering of the community that includes Indigenous dancing, singing, music, food, crafts, intricate regalia and more.The Catawba Nation sees the event as a way to connect with the...
ROCK HILL, S.C. (WBTV) - Indigenous people with roots in York County will be sharing their culture with the community in Rock Hill all weekend.
Winthrop University in Rock Hill will host the Catawba Nation Powwow starting Friday, March 13, through Sunday, March 15. The event will take place at the Winthrop Coliseum.
A Native American Powwow is a gathering of the community that includes Indigenous dancing, singing, music, food, crafts, intricate regalia and more.
The Catawba Nation sees the event as a way to connect with their ancestors, and with the community.
“It’s a time when we come together as a community, honor our elders and veterans, and celebrate who we are through song, dance, food, and fellowship,” Laney Buckley, community engagement director for the Catawba Nation, told Visit York County.
Tribal nations from across the U.S. were expected to be present at the event. Everyone is welcome to attend the powwow, event organizers say.
The powwow will include various dancing and music “specials,” in which winners for each event will take home cash prizes.
The powwow will take place on Friday, March 13; Saturday, March 14; and Sunday, March 15. Start times vary each day.
Doors will open two hours before each Grand Entry, according to event organizers.
The event will be hosted at Winthrop Coliseum on Winthrop University’s campus in Rock Hill, South Carolina.
Tickets cost $5 for children aged 6-17, for adults 55 and older, and for military members (with ID). Tickets cost $10 for adults aged 18-54.
Children 5 years old and younger can attend for free. A weekend pass costs $25.
Catawba Nation tribal members can get in for half price with their ID.
---> Other news:
A flood of public comments washed through the Rock Hill region last week after two reports of chemical spills at the Silfab Solar plant in Fort Mill.Many people asked a pair of questions that already were a common refrain in three years of intense public debate: How could a manufacturing company using industrial chemicals be allowed to operate beside an elementary school? And why did the school district decide to put two schools near there?This comment was typical following a 300-gallon potassium hydroxide solution spill on Mar...
A flood of public comments washed through the Rock Hill region last week after two reports of chemical spills at the Silfab Solar plant in Fort Mill.
Many people asked a pair of questions that already were a common refrain in three years of intense public debate: How could a manufacturing company using industrial chemicals be allowed to operate beside an elementary school? And why did the school district decide to put two schools near there?
This comment was typical following a 300-gallon potassium hydroxide solution spill on March 3: “Never should have been built beside schools and homes,” Carole Flynn commented on a Fort Mill School District Facebook post. “What idiots decided that?”
Flint Hill Elementary School is adjacent to Silfab and Flint Hill Middle School is under construction.
Two days after the potassium hydroxide spill, York County reported a leak that Silfab found in February from a hydrofluoric acid holding tank. That second report prompted the S.C. Department of Environmental Services to issue a stop work order for Silfab until the agency could investigate.
That review happened Monday, and Silfab resumed its solar panel assembly operations Monday night. It has yet to begin manufacturing that involves chemicals.
Many residents blamed York County for allowing Silfab to open next to a school. Some blamed the school district for building next to Silfab.
So, who is actually responsible for how Silfab and the schools wound up being neighbors? To untangle the issue, The Herald reviewed county, court and property records dating back nearly a decade, as well as school district documents, county public statements, zoning decisions and the paper’s archive coverage to determine what happened, and how.
Like many aspects of the Silfab controversy, the question of whether the Fort Mill School District or Silfab got to Gold Hill Road first isn’t a simple one.
Both sites belonged to The Eubanks Family Partnership, in a spot between Interstate 77 and U.S. 21 that was zoned for light industrial uses in 1992.
In 2017, the school district acquired 40 acres from the Eubanks partnership for $10. That was the first part of the now 88-acre district site where Flint Hill Elementary is, and where Flint Hill Middle School is under construction.
The district got the rest of the property in the summer for 2020, through three deals with Eubanks family members combining for $4.5 million, land records show.
In between those deals, work began that eventually would bring Silfab to Fort Mill. In 2019, York County planners approved a traffic analysis for three new commercial buildings at 7149 Logistics Lane.
That fall, The Eubanks partnership sold two properties beside the school site, at nearly 70 acres combined, for $8.5 million. Properties would be subdivided in 2020 for those new buildings, including the one where Silfab is.
So, the school district owned some property on Gold Hill Road first — but commercial building development was underway before the district owned its entire site.
Economic developers are typically tight-lipped about big deals before they’re complete, but it’s clear Silfab was in the picture by summer 2021.
That’s when York County Economic Development asked county planners if solar panel manufacturing was allowed in light industrial areas. County staff indicated it was. The Silfab building was completed in 2022.
An early 2022 county code update that disallowed schools in light industrial areas prompted the Fort Mill school district to rezone its 88 acres. The school district applied for rezoning in October 2022, telling county planners to expect an elementary and middle school.
The district had some conversations about putting schools there since 2016, school officials told the county.
In late December 2022, while the school rezoning request was still under consideration, York County planners sent a letter to Silfab stating solar panel manufacturing would be allowed at 7149 Logistics Lane.
At that point, the possibility of neighboring properties with manufacturing chemicals and school children began its collision course.
In February 2023, The Herald named Silfab as the company negotiating with York County for a Fort Mill site. Two weeks later, on On March 6, 2023, the school and Silfab projects both reached a key decision point.
Rezoning for the schools would finish right as Silfab’s incentive approval began.
York County Council voted unanimously that night to finalize the school site rezoning to a zoning class that allows for schools. Later at that meeting, Council voted 5-2 for a tax incentive agreement for Project Mountie, then the codename for Silfab, a Canadian company.
The tax incentives were finalized in September 2023. It projected 800 jobs and a $150 million investment from Silfab.
Early on, though, there were concerns.
Council deferred a vote on the Silfab incentive package when it first came up on Feb. 20, 2023. Councilwoman Debi Cloninger, who represents the district that includes the Silfab and school sites, brought up environmental issues with new schools going beside manufacturing.
As for whether someone in authority should have seen the chemical and school issue coming, some people did. Most of the pushback came from residents, however.
They began speaking out about those concerns in early 2023, and kept doing so through September 2023 when Council approved the Silfab incentive deal by a 4-3 vote.
Split votes on large incentive deals aren’t common in York County. But they happened throughout the more than six-month approval process for Silfab.
Along with traffic, environmental concerns due to chemicals were a major reason why some Council members voted against the Silfab deal. Board members even amended the deal the night they finalized it, requiring Silfab and the property owner to maintain $1 million in environmental insurance for the duration of the tax incentive deal.
That policy would also insure the county, according to the Sept. 18, 2023, vote.
A $50,000 letter of credit was required in the event property owners or tenants had to address an issue requiring “clean up in order to allow a business to occupy the site,” according to the deal.
When residents brought concerns to the school board, board members told them Silfab zoning questions were a York County issue. The school district did address environmental testing plans at Flint Hill Elementary, contracting with environmental monitoring consultant Citadel EHS in May 2025.
The school board never openly discussed any plans to stop construction at either of the new schools once the Silfab project became publicly known.
The school district owned land in the area first, but Silfab’s building was completed before either school opened. Both projects were too far along to back out on account of the other.
Once Silfab and the school district had their county approvals, the groups followed similar timelines.
Two weeks after York County finalized the Silfab incentives, the Fort Mill school board approved a construction contract on Oct. 3, 2023, to build the $56.3 million Flint Hill Elementary. The next day, RG Baxter Lane sold what is now the Silfab property to Pennsylvania-based Exeter 7149 Logistics for $106 million.
In early December 2023, the school board voted to hold a $204 million bond referendum the following spring that included money to build Flint Hill Middle right beside Flint Hill Elementary.
But by early 2024, the Silfab project faced mounting questions from residents.
Neighbor Wally Buchanan asked the county for a zoning interpretation in February on why Silfab was allowed in a light industrial spot. Dissatisfied with the response, Buchanan appealed his request in March 2024 to the county Zoning Board of Appeals.
That same month, school district voters approved the bond referendum that allowed for construction of Flint Hill Middle.
Public debate turned feverish by the time Buchanan’s case made it to the Zoning Board of Appeals. On May 9, 2024, a packed crowd at the government center in York heard the appeals board vote against county planning staff’s prior decision.
The appeals board ruled solar panel manufacturing, previously unlisted by name in the county code, should only be allowed in heavy industrial areas.
Silfab opponents thought they’d finally won. They thought wrong, and learned a month later that York County didn’t intend to stop Silfab. The county took the position that the zoning board’s decision impacted future projects, but not Silfab since it was ongoing.
Still, Silfab appealed the appeals board decision in June 2024.
In November 2024, Silfab announced it had closed on $100 million of new funding to scale its solar cell manufacturing site in Fort Mill. The company intended to be operational by the end of that year, about eight months before Flint Hill Elementary’s planned opening.
In July and December 2025, the Supreme Court of South Carolina declined to hear two cases related to Silfab. In between, Flint Hill Elementary opened on Aug. 4, 2025.
As several state court cases progressed, the school board continuously called Silfab zoning questions a legal issue outside its control.
In January, a state Circuit Court ruling dismissed a case challenging York County’s actions in support of Silfab. The county issued a statement urging citizens to “be respectful in their disagreement and to avoid publicly advancing allegations or accusations” impugning the county’s character or conduct.
Two months later, York County posted the first report of Silfab’s initial spill. And residents erupted again.
Not just because schools were built beside a factory and a factory was built beside a school. But because both pushed forward with parallel plans without breaking stride, regardless of how they’d be impacted by the properties beside them.
Use the timeline below for more details on school and Silfab decisions:
Reality Check reflects the Rock Hill Herald’s commitment to holding those in power to account, shining a light on public issues that affect our local readers and illuminating the stories that set the Rock Hill region apart. Email realitycheck@heraldonline.com
ROCK HILL, S.C. (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — The future is now at a Rock Hill coffee shop, where the customers consuming caffeine aren’t the only ones wired.Folks can also get a taste of something modern, thanks to a plugged-in power couple at Techno Café inside the historic Lowenstein Building.“Adam and Eve, they’re getting to work,” customer Tim Griffin said.Yes, it’s true, their names are Adam and Eve.“This is different,” said co-owner Keith Ingalls, describing the ...
ROCK HILL, S.C. (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — The future is now at a Rock Hill coffee shop, where the customers consuming caffeine aren’t the only ones wired.
Folks can also get a taste of something modern, thanks to a plugged-in power couple at Techno Café inside the historic Lowenstein Building.
“Adam and Eve, they’re getting to work,” customer Tim Griffin said.
Yes, it’s true, their names are Adam and Eve.
“This is different,” said co-owner Keith Ingalls, describing the reaction of some customers.
They’re called robaristas. Adam handles hot and iced coffee drinks, while Eve does only hot drinks.
“They were made for each other!” Griffin said.
After you order on your phone, you watch the robotic process, waiting for a voice and dramatic drink delivery, when the coffee is lowered into a compartment.
Cheryl Stambaugh is partial to Adam. Just don’t call him, Mr. Coffee.
“He never talks back to me, he’s always kind to me, he says my name,” said Stambaugh.
Co-owners Keith and Chauntel Ingalls say Swiss-engineered technology tells Adam and Eve what to do to provide a high-end coffee experience.
“The robot doesn’t make anything. The robot is moving a cup from point A to point B,” Ingalls told Queen City News.
The robotic arm is kind of spellbinding, especially at first. The Ingalls and the Techno Cafe staff are on hand to help or to chat.
“We greet people, especially the ones that don’t know what’s going on,” Keith said.
“We wanted it to be special and build a coffee shop around these kiosks and a community,” said Chauntel.
Their pivot to a futuristic-looking business model began after COVID-19.
“We owned a deli and a convenience store in a hospital,” Keith said.
The pandemic took its toll on their ability to have 24/7 staffing at the deli.
“So we went on the hunt trying to find ideas that we could offer on the overnights while we were closed that was automated,” he said. “That was the conception of Techno Café.”
The drawback might be that there’s no barista to talk to, but there’s also no barista to spell your name wrong on the cup.
“Ha-ha and he always gets my name right, it’s great,” Stambaugh said.
Techno Café has kiosks in Maine and New Hampshire, and they hope to deploy them in more Carolinas locations.
Even if robaristas did someday become the wave of the future, Keith says humans will always be key.
“There are people behind the scenes that have to reset these, have to manage those things. They’re just not done on an eight-hour basis,” he said.
Griffin works remotely and says automated service has its perks.
“There’s not a lot of loud noise going on,” said Griffin. “You don’t hear a lot of noise going on from baristas yelling. You don’t hear the clanging of the frother.”
“I mean most of the time you think about a coffee shop they’re pounding [coffee drinks] through any way, you don’t get a lot of interaction. But this coffee is so good,” Stambaugh said.
It’s not your average cup of Joe, served by a boxy barista with quite an arm.
“I might be a little bit smitten. Him and I are bros now,” Stambaugh said.